Skip to main content

Malignant Deciduoid Mesothelioma: case presentation of an exceptional variant and review of the literature

Abstract

Background

Malignant Deciduoid Mesothelioma (MDM) is an extremely rare variant of epithelioid mesothelioma. It was first described in young females, in the peritoneum, and its relation with asbestos was not well defined.

Later reports, have shown that this variant may also occur in the pleura, the pericardium and the tunica vaginalis of elderly people, who had been exposed to asbestos.

Case presentation

We report a case of malignant deciduoid mesothelioma that occurred in the peritoneal cavity, and the omentum of a 35-year-old woman. The patient had never been exposed to asbestos.

Conclusions

Through this observation, we describe clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical findings of deciduoid mesothelioma, and review the literature reports.

Peer Review reports

Background

MDM is an extremely rare subtype of malignant epithelioid mesothelioma, with a poor prognosis. It was first described by Talerman et al. [1] in 1985 and Nascimento et al. [2] in 1994, characterized by the presence of cytomorphological features resembling decidual reaction [3].

Few cases have been reported in the literature to date, in the form of single case reports. A total of 25 cases of deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma have been documented in the English literature, since this entity was first described in 1985 [1, 2, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].

The aim of the present report is to describe MDM of the peritoneum, to discuss the differential diagnosis and management of this extremely rare tumour.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old female patient, with no medical history, was admitted for an appendicular syndrome. There was no history of asbestos exposure. On physical examination, she had a low-grade fever. A generalized abdominal tenderness and distension were also reported. Abdominal ultrasound examination showed moderate ascites, and hyperechogenic mesenteric fat. An exploratory laparotomy revealed multiple firm nodules, white to gray, infiltrating the peritoneal cavity, and the omentum. A biopsy was performed. We received four firm, gray white fragments. Microscopically, H&E stain showed sheets of malignant cells, formed exclusively by large pleomorphic epithelioid cells with abundant, eosinophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei were large and vesicular, with prominent nucleoli (Figs. 1 and 2). The cell borders were variably well defined. Focally tumor cells showed finely vacuolated cytoplasm, with binucleated and multinucleated cells. Areas of necrosis were commonly seen. Lymphoplasmacytic and neutrophilic infiltration was moderate to dense.

Fig. 1
figure1

Histological section showing large solid sheets of malignant epithelioid cells

Fig. 2
figure2

Decidual tumor cells with large eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli

In immunohistochemistry, tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, calretinin (Fig. 3), D2–40, CK5/6 and WT-1. They were negative for Ber-EP4, CEA, estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors, and HMB-45. The microscopic and immunohistochemical findings were compatible with deciduoid malignant mesothelioma. The patient received 5 cycles of chemotherapy. She presently has a survival of 12 months.

Fig. 3
figure3

tumor cells with positive immunoreactivity to calretinin

Discussion

Deciduoid mesothelioma was initially reported in the peritoneum of young women, with no history of asbestos exposure. Later reports have demonstrated that this entity could occur in the pleura and pericardium of older men and women who had been exposed to asbestos [15, 16].

This designation was first introduced by Nascimento et al. [2] in 1994, to describe a rare variant of epithelioid mesothelioma, that reflect a morphological resemblance with decidua or decidual type changes [15].

The scarcity of this entity was highlighted by Ordonez and al. [15] in the latest review of malignant deciduoid mesothelioma. Only 25 cases of deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma have been reported until today [1, 2, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Seventeen of these patients were female, with ages ranging from 8 to 78 years. Nineteen cases were unrelated etiologically to asbestos. The five cases associated with asbestos exposure were noted in elderly patients (Table 1).

Table 1 Summary of the cases of Malignant Deciduoid Mesothelioma in the peritoneum, reported in the literature

Clinically, symptoms are often insidious and nonspecific, causing a delay in diagnosis; the imaging findings are also not specific. Histologically, there are four major subtypes of mesothelioma: epithelioid, sarcomatoid, desmoplastic and biphasic. Deciduoide mesothelioma is a rare subtype of epithelioid mesothelioma, in which a wide range of histopathological patterns is described [18, 19].

Microscopically, deciduoid mesothelioma is composed of large, polygonal, or round cells, arranged in solid nests and in trabecula [13, 18, 19]. The cytoplasm is abundant eosinophilic with well-defined cell borders [18, 19]. The nuclei is large and vesicular, with prominent nucleoli. Nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear pseudoinclusions, multinucleated cells have been reported. Mitotic index is variable, with high mitotic activity and atypical mitoses observed in some cases. Several features described in the literature include the presence of foamy cells, with clear cytoplasm, and mucinous or myxoid stroma [15].

A large immunohistochemical panel is essential for accurate diagnosis, and help in distinguishing differentiel diagnosis. The International Mesothelioma Panel and the WHO recommend to use at least 2 mesothelial and 2 carcinoma markers, in addition to a pancytokeratin [19, 20]. The choice of immunohistochemical markers used varies depending on the histologic type of mesothelioma, the location of the tumor (pleural versus peritoneal), and the type of tumor being considered in the differential diagnosis [20].

Based on their specificity and sensitivity, calretinin, CK5/6, EMA, WT-1 and D2–40 are de the best mesothelial markers, and are positive in MDM [19]. Ber-EP4, B72.3, and carcinoembryonic antigen are not expressed in mesothelioma. They are the most commonly used markers to eliminate carcinoma (primary peritoneal carcinoma, and secondary peritoneal carcinomatosis) [19]. Others markers can be added to assist in the differential diagnosis.

Our findings illustrated that calretinin, AE1/AE3, CK5/6, D2–40 and WT-1 were positive. Ber-EP4, CEA showed a negative result, respectively, which is consistent with the literature.

Peritoneal Deciduoid mesotheliomas of women should be distinguished from diffuse pseudotumoral deciduosis. This condition has been frequently associated with pregnancy, but also observed in the perimenarchal and postmenopausal periods [15]. Microscopically, the nuclei are smaller and have dark dense chromatin [13]. Decidual cells lack expression of pancytokeratin and calretinin. However, they strongly express CD10, alpha inhibin, estrogen and progesterone receptors [15, 21].

Trophoblastic neoplasia is also important to consider in the differential diagnosis [21]. The neoplastic cells in this condition express HCG [15].

Positive staining for AE1/AE3 and calretinin are useful to exclude Rhabdomyosarcoma, epithelioid gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), melanoma and epithelioid angiosarcoma [16, 21]. Immunohistochemical staining should easily distinguish these entities, using Desmin and myogenin for rhabdomyosarcoma; C-kit and Dog1 for GIST; Melan-A, HMB-45 for melanoma; and ERG for angiosarcoma [21].

Chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery are usually the best therapeutic options. Cisplatin and pemetrexed have demonstrated a significant survival advantage, and are considered as firstline treatment [16, 17].

The deciduoid subtype was regarded by some authors to be a more aggressive variant [6]. However, some recent reviews of reported cases did not reveal a significantly worse survival in patients with deciduoid features. There are no large survival studies for MDM due to its rarity [9].

Conclusions

In summary, through this observation, we want to highlight the rarity of this variant. It is important for pathologists to recognize this morphological variant of epithelioid mesothelioma, easily confused with other diangnosis, and discuss the available treatment options. We believe that more studies on a larger number of cases may be helpful in further defining this entity.

Abbreviations

ER:

estrogen receptors

H&E:

Hematoxylin and eosin

MDM:

Malignant Deciduoid Mesothelioma

PR:

progesterone receptors

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Talerman A, Montero JR, Chilcote RR, Okagaki T. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma in a 13-year-old girl. Report of a case and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 1985;9:73–80.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nascimento AG, Keeney GL, Fletcher CD. Deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma. An unusual phenotype affecting young females. Am J Surg Pathol. 1994;18:439–45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Santosa C, Gamboaa F, Fradinhoa F, Pêgoa A, Carvalhob L. Bernardoc J Deciduoid pleural mesothelioma --- a rare entity in a young woman. Rev Port Pneumol. 2012;18(6):294–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Orosz Z, Nagy P, Szentirmay Z, et al. Epithelial mesothelioma with deciduoid features. Virchows Arch. 1999;434:263–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shanks JH, Harris M, Banerjee SS, et al. Mesotheliomas with deciduoid morphology: a morphologic spectrum and a variant not confined to young females. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24:285–94.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Desai S, Kane S, Bharde S, et al. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma deciduoid or anaplastic variant? Point to ponder. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001;44:159–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gillespie FR, van derWalt JD, Derias N, et al. Deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma. Rep Cytological Appearances Cytopathol. 2001;12:57–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Okonkwo A, Musunuri S, Diaz L Jr, et al. Deciduoid mesothelioma: a rare, distinct entity with unusual features. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2001;5:168–71.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shia J, Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS. Deciduoid Mesothelioma: a report of 5 cases and literature review. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2002;26:355–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chung DJ, Kang YW, Kim BK, et al. Deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma: CT findings with pathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:614–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Maeda S, Hosone M, Katayama H, et al. Deciduoid mesothelioma in the pelvic cavity. Pathol Int. 2004;54:67–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kimura N, Ogasawara T, Asonuma S, et al. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor- and interleukin 6- producing diffuse deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:446–50.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mourra N, de Chaisemartin C, Goubin-Versini I, et al. Malignant deciduoid mesothelioma: a diagnostic challenge. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129:403–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ustun H, Astarci HM, Sungu N, et al. Primary malignant deciduoid peritoneal mesothelioma: a report of the cytohistological and immunohistochemical appearances. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;39:402–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ordonez NG. Deciduoid mesothelioma: report of 21cases with review of the literature. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1481–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Huang CC1, Michael CW. Michael (2013) Deciduoid Mesothelioma: Cytologic presentation and diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 41(7), 629-635.

  17. 17.

    Wolff-Bar M, Dujovny T, Vlodavsky E, Postovsky S, Morgenstern S, Braslavsky D, Nissan A, Steinberg R, Feinmesser M. An 8-year-old child with malignant Deciduoid Mesothelioma of the abdomen: report of a case and review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2015;18(4):327–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ushio R, Yamamoto M, Shibata Y, Ishii H, Watanabe K, Takahashi R, Sato T, Kudo M, Miyake A, Kaneko T, Ishigatsubo Y. An autopsy case report of malignant pleural Mesothelioma with Deciduoid features. Intern Med. 2015;54:2915–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, et al. (2015) WHO classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. IARC press (Lyon, France) 156-168.

  20. 20.

    Husain AN, Colby T, Ordonez N, Krausz T, Attanoos R, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, Butnor K, Cagle PT, Chirieac LR, Churg A, Dacic S, Fraire A, Galateau-Salle F, Gibbs A, Gown A, Hammar S, Litzky L, Marchevsky AM, Nicholson AG, Roggli V, Travis WD, Wick M, International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant Mesothelioma : a consensus statement from the international Mesothelioma interest group. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:1317–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Galateau-Salle F, Goubin-Versini I, Duvillard P, Mourra N. Groussard O. Bull de la division française de l'AIP. 2009;49:63–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this case are included in this published article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK analyzed and interpreted the patient data, drafted the manuscript and made the figures. BE performed the histological examination, proposed the study, supervised MK and revised the manuscript. SE and RK have made substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of patient data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mouna Khmou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khmou, M., Echcharif, S., Kabbaj, R. et al. Malignant Deciduoid Mesothelioma: case presentation of an exceptional variant and review of the literature. BMC Clin Pathol 17, 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-017-0051-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Mesothelioma
  • Deciduoid
  • Peritoneum
  • Immunohistochemistry