Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Primary gastric actinomycosis: report of a case diagnosed in a gastroscopic biopsy

  • Khaleel Al-Obaidy1,
  • Fatimah Alruwaii1,
  • Areej Al Nemer1,
  • Raed Alsulaiman2,
  • Zainab Alruwaii3 and
  • Mohamed A Shawarby1Email author
BMC Clinical Pathology201515:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0002-8

Received: 7 April 2014

Accepted: 9 February 2015

Published: 26 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Primary gastric actinomycosis is extremely rare, the appendix and ileocecal region being the most commonly involved sites in abdominopelvic actinomycosis. Herein, we report a case of primary gastric actinomycosis. The diagnosis was made on microscopic evaluation of gastroscopic biopsy specimens. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third case to be reported in the literature, in which the diagnosis was made in a gastroscopic biopsy rather than a resection specimen.

Case presentation

An 87-year-old Saudi male on medication for cardiomyopathy, premature ventricular contractions, renal impairment, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, presented to the emergency department with acute diffuse abdominal pain, abdominal distension, constipation and vomiting for two days, with no history of fever, abdominal surgery or trauma. The patient was admitted to the hospital with an impression of gastric outlet obstruction. Based on radiologic and gastroscopic findings, a non-infectious etiology was suspected, possibly adenocarcinoma or lymphoma. Gastroscopic biopsies showed an actively inflamed, focally ulcerated atrophic fundic mucosa along with fragments of a fibrinopurulent exudate containing brownish, iron negative pigment and abundant filamentous bacteria, morphologically consistent with Actinomyces.

Conclusion

Althuogh extremely rare, primary gastric actinomycosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of radiologic and gastroscopic diffuse gastric wall thickening and submucosal tumor-like or infiltrative lesions, particularly in patients with history of abdominal surgery or trauma, or those receiving extensive medication. A high level of suspicion is required by the pathologist to achieve diagnosis in gastroscopic biopsies. Subtle changes such as the presence of a pigmented inflammatory exudate should alert the pathologist to perform appropriate special stains to reveal the causative organism.

Keywords

Actinomycosis Gastric Grocott’s Gram PAS

Background

Actinomycosis is a chronic suppurative granulomatous inflammation caused by anaerobic, filamentous, Gram-positive bacteria of Actinomyces species, most often Actinomyces israelii. There are three main forms of actinomycosis, namely, cervicofacial (31%-65%), abdominopelvic (20%-36%) and thoracic (15%-30%) [1-4]. In abdominopelvic actinomycosis, the appendix and ileocecal region are the most commonly involved sites (65%) [2,3,5-7]. Primary gastric actinomycosis is extremely rare, with only 23 cases reported to date [5,6,8-20]. Herein, we report a case of primary gastric actinomycosis. The diagnosis was made on microscopic evaluation of gastroscopic biopsy specimens. To the best of our knowledge, this is the third case to be reported in the literature, in which the diagnosis was made in a gastroscopic biopsy rather than a resection specimen [6,8].

Case presentation

Clinical and laboratory findings

An 87-year-old Saudi male on medication for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, frequent premature ventricular contractions, renal impairment, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, presented to the emergency department with acute diffuse abdominal pain, abdominal distension, constipation and vomiting of two days duration, with no history of fever, abdominal surgery or trauma. Medications received by the patient for the last four years included, mainly, daily acetyl salicylic acid 81 mg, atorvastatin 40 mg, irbesartan 300 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg. Abdominal examination revealed stable vital signs along with positive findings of abdominal distension and mild epigastric tenderness. Laboratory investigations showed leucocytosis (16.6 k/μl with 89% segmented cells), mild normocytic normochromic anemia (Hgb 11.5 g/dl, MCV 93.7 fl, MCH 31.7 pg), elevated serum lipase (1123 U/L), amylase (269 U/L), and creatinine (1.4 mg/dl), and low potassium (3.1 mEq/L). Plain abdominal X-ray showed a markedly dilated stomach (Figure 1a). The patient was admitted to the hospital with an impression of gastric outlet obstruction. NGT was inserted & aspiration yielded a large amount of greenish fluid. The patient was then immediately put on empiric antibiotic coverage for 5 days with 2 doses of IV levofloxacin and 3 doses of IV metronidazole administered. Contrast CT-scan, performed to rule out an organic cause for the gastric outlet obstruction, showed a significantly distended stomach with thickened wall and abnormal configuration, and a single air-fluid level (Figure 1b). Two gastroscopies were then performed, 1 week apart, and revealed a deformed stomach with a hard mass infiltrating the greater curvature in the fundic area, covered by necrotic greenish brown material, along with absent peristaltic movement and no apparent organic obstruction to the gastric outlet (Figure 2). Based on the radiologic and gastroscopic findings, a non-infectious etiology was suspected, possibly adenocarcinoma or lymphoma. Biopsies obtained from the edge and the centre of the fundic mass during both gastroscopies were sent for pathological examination. Histologic examination showed an actively inflamed, focally ulcerated, atrophic fundic mucosa with variable, focal eosinophilic infiltration, edema, and variably dilated foveolae with focal regenerative epithelial atypia (Figure 3). There were also fragments of a fibrinopurulent exudate mixed with brownish, iron negative pigment (Perl’s stain) and abundant PAS, Grocott’s, and Gram positive rod-like and filamentous bacteria, morphologically consistent with Actinomyces (Figure 4). The organisms were overlooked in the first biopsy. The second biopsy was performed because a diagnosis of malignancy was still in suspicion, despite the negative result of the first biopsy. A revisit to the first biopsy confirmed negativity for malignancy but revealed the presence of organisms identical to those noted in the second biopsy. Culturing of gastric contents following the second gastroscopy, yielded only Streptococcus viridans with no Actinomyces identified. However, anaerobic culture was not specifically ordered by the clinician. Consequently Actinomyces, known to be strictly anaerobic, were not detected. Despite the negative culture, the typical morphology of the organisms in tissue sections confirmed by positive Grocott, PAS and Gram staining was considerd sufficient for diagnosis with no necessity for confirmation by repeat culturing under anaerobic conditions.
Figure 1

Radiologic findings. a. Plain abdominal X-ray showing a markedly dilated stomach b. Contrast CT-scan showing a significantly distended stomach with thickened wall and abnormal configuration. Note also air-fluid level.

Figure 2

Gastroscopy. Deformed stomach, with rotation like appearance. There are inflamed areas with greenish brown material over the surface.

Figure 3

Gastroscopic biopsies. a. Inflamed atrophic mucosa with dilated foveolae and pigmented fibrinopurulent inflammatory exudate. H & E x 100 b. Perl’s stain showing iron negative brownish pigment. x 400.

Figure 4

Filamentous and rod-like bacteria consistent withActinomycesin gastroscopic biopsies. a. H & E x 400 b. PAS x 1000 c. Gram x 1000 d. Grocott’s x 1000.

The patient was then managed conservatively in the hospital. A third gastroscopic biopsy two weeks later revealed chronic atrophic gastritis with no Actinomyces detected, and the patient appeared in a good health status. A plan was set up to start him on the appropriate antibiotic therapy for actinomycosis with follow up gastroscopy after one month. However, the patient chose to continue treatment somewhere else. So he was discharged on his request and never showed up again in our institution.

Discussion

Actinomycosis in human is most commonly caused by Actinomyces israelii [1,3,21-26] which is an endogenous commensal present in the oral and GI-tract flora [9,10,12,22,27]. Actinomycetes typically invade injured mucosa with opportunistic infection occuring if there is a break in the mucosal barrier. Factors that precipitate intra-abdominal actinomycosis include GI surgery, inflammation, and visceral perforation [28,29]. However, in most cases of gastric actinomycosis, it has been impossible to trace the mechanism by which Actinomyces had reached the gastric wall [30]. Our patient had no past history of abdominal surgery or trauma. However, he was on prolonged medication for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, premature ventricular contractions, renal impairment, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Such extensive medication may have caused physical or functional gastric mucosal damage that facilitated entry of the organisms into the gastric wall. Numerous drugs, acting through various mechanisms, have been associated with gastric mucosal damage [31]. Age related mucosal atrophy may have also contributed to diminished mucosal resistance.

The rarity of gastric involvement by actinomycosis has been attributed to the high lumenal acidity of the stomach. As a result of the low gastric pH, the organisms may be killed or growth is inhibited [9].

The usual presenting clinical manifestations of gastric actinomycosis are low-grade fever, epigastric pain, weight loss, and upper GI bleeding [1,3,10,12,20]. One patient developed symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction [19]. The duration of symptoms ranged from two weeks to several years [3,8,9,11,19]. Our patient presented with acute diffuse abdominal pain, abdominal distension, constipation and vomiting for two days duration, with no history of fever. The clinical impression was that of gastric outlet obstruction.

There is no specific radiological or endoscopic appearance for gastric actinomycosis. CT findings have mostly demonstrated an infiltrative lesion with diffuse gastric wall thickening. The appearance suggested adenocarcinoma or lymphoma of the stomach [2,20,32]. In our case, contrast CT-scan showed a significantly distended stomach with thickened wall and abnormal configuration. Similar to radiologic studies, the endoscopic findings of the disease may simulate a gastric neoplasm and include submucosal tumor-like or infiltrative lesions and, occasionally, mucosal ulceration [13]. A non-infectious etiology was initially suspected in our patient based on radiologic and endoscopic findings, possibly adenocarcinoma or lymphoma, and the gastric outlet obstruction subsequently interpreted as functional due to absence of peristaltic movement consequent to infiltration of the gastric wall by actinomycosis. An associated paralytic ileus due to acute pancreatitis may be an alternative explanation for the obstruction as suggested by elevated serum lipase and amylase levels. Such obstruction may have also contributed to the gastric localization of the actinomycosis, so that the clinical manifestations may be a consequence of acute pancreatitis with secondary gastric overinfection by Actinomyces, facilitated by the mucosal damage.

Because of the submucosal localization of the inflammatory process, gastroscopic biopsy specimens usually reveal nonspecific inflammatory changes [3,14,18,19]. In most cases, the diagnosis was made after surgery and histopathological examination of the resected specimen [9,12,19,20,22]. Only two cases have been reported in which the diagnosis of gastric actinomycosis was made on microscopic evaluation of a gastroscopic biopsy specimen [6,8]. In our case, the diagnosis was, likewise, established through histologic examination of gastroscopic biopsies in which abundant PAS, Grocott’s, and Gram positive rod-like and filamentous bacteria, morphologically consistent with Actinomyces were identified. The presence of a brownish, iron negative pigment in the fibrinopurulent inflammatory exudate (that was also visible endoscopically) alerted us to the possibility of actinomycosis which was established by appropriate special staining that revealed the microorganisms. It is well known that the main sources of natural pigments are plants and microorganisms, including Actinomycets [33].

Culturing is negative in most cases of gastric actinomycosis (>76%) [19,24,25]. In our case, culturing yielded only Streptococcus viridans, another endogenous aerobic/anaerobic facultative commensal present in the oral and GI-tract flora [34]. Despite the negative culture, the typical morphology of the organisms in tissue sections confirmed by positive Grocott, PAS and Gram staining was considered sufficient for the diagnosis of Actinomyces infection with no necessity for culture confirmation.

Most anaerobic bacteria recovered from clinical infections are found mixed with other anaerobic organisms [35]. Polymicrobial infections are known to be more pathogenic for experimental animals than are those involving single organisms [35]. Whether Streptococcus viridans, known to be an organism of low virulence, had contributed to the gastritis in our case remains unclear.

Primary gastric actinomycosis is an indolent infection. If the disease is recognized, the prognosis is good because antibiotic treatment, particularly penecillin is very effective [4,19]. Our patient received 2 doses of IV levofloxacin and 3 doses of IV metronidazole and appeared in a good health status, two weeks after diagnosis.

Conclusions

Althuogh extremely rare, primary gastric actinomycosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of radiologic and gastroscopic diffuse gastric wall thickening and submucosal tumor-like or infiltrative lesions, particularly in patients with history of abdominal surgery or trauma or those receiving extensive medication. A high level of suspicion is required by the pathologist to achieve diagnosis in gastroscopic biopsies. Subtle changes such as the presence of a pigmented inflammatory exudate should alert the pathologist to perform appropriate special stains to reveal the causative organism.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr Amani Al Nemer, Assistant Professor, Microbiology Department, University of Dammam for reviewing the results of H & E and special staining of micro-organisms in tissue sections. The authors also acknowledge the services of Mr Shakir Ahmed and Mrs Maria Rosario Lazaro from the histopathology laboratory of the University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia for conducting the histology technical work.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pathology Department, College of Medicine, University of Dammam
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Dammam
(3)
King Fahd Hospital of the University, University of Dammam

References

  1. Choi MM, Beak JH, Lee JN, Park S, Lee WS. Clinical features of abdominopelvic actinomycosis: report of twenty cases and literature review. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:555–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Isik B, Aydin E, Sogutlu G, Ara C, Yilmaz S, Kirimlioglu V. Abdominal actinomycosis simulating malignancy of the right colon. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1312–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lee YM, Law WL, Chu KW. Abdominal actinomycosis. Aust N Z J Surg. 2001;71:261–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang YH, Tsai HC, Lee SS, Mai MH, Wann SR, Chen YS, et al. Clinical manifestations of actinomycosis in Southern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007;40:487–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Oksüz M, Sandikçi S, Culhaci A, Egesel T, Tuncer I. Primary gastric actinomycosis: a case report. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2007;18:44–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee SH, Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Chung IK, Kim HS, Park SH, et al. Primary gastric actinomycosis diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy: case report. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:586–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans J, Chan C, Gluch L, Fielding I, Eckstein R. Inflammatory pseudotumour secondary to actinomyces infection. Aust N Z J Surg. 1999;69:467–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Minamino H, Machida H, Tominaga K, Kameda N, Okazaki H, Tanigawa T, et al. A case report on primary gastric actinomycosis. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2011;53(2):262–9.Google Scholar
  9. Skoutelis A, Panagopoulos C, Kalfarentzos F, Bassaris H. Intramural gastric actinomycosis. South Med J. 1995;88:647–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee CM, Ng SH, Wan YL, Tsai CH. Gastric actinomycosis. J Formos Med Assoc. 1996;95:66–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Silvestre V, Fernández-Roldán R, Cortes L, Garcia-Blanch G. Gastric actinomycosis: a rare complication after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1012–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Olmen G, Larmuseau MF, Geboes K, Rutgeerts P, Penninckx F, Vantrappen G. Primary gastric actinomycosis: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol. 1984;79(7):512–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Mazuji MK, Henry JS. Gastric actinomycosis: case report. Arch Surg. 1967;94:292–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Urdaneta LF, Belin RP, Cueto J, Doberneck RC. Intramural gastric actinomycosis. Surgery. 1967;62:431–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Figueras Felip J, Martín Rague J, Madesvall N, Norquera C, Casias AL. Intramural gastric abscess. Rev Esp Enfer Apar Dig. 1979;56:267–70.Google Scholar
  16. Dellagi K, Kchir N, Mezni F, Boubaker S, el Quertani L, Zitouni MM, et al. Abdominal actinomycosis: a rare complication of gastric surgery? A propos of a case. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1986;22:391–3.Google Scholar
  17. Eastridge CE, Prather JR, Hughes FA. Actinomycosis: a 24-year experience. South Med J. 1972;65:839–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson E. Abdominal actinomycosis with special reference to the stomach. Br J Surg. 1961;49:266–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee DL, Kang JY, Kim H, Lee KH, Choi GY, Jeon WJ, et al. A case of primary gastric actinomycosis. Korean J Med. 2009;77:S27–30.Google Scholar
  20. Euanorasetr C, Sornmayura P. Gastric Outlet Obstruction Secondary to Gastric Actinomycosis: A Case Report and Literature Review. The THAI Journal of SURGERY. 2010;31:63–8.Google Scholar
  21. Kaszuba M, Tomaszewska R, Pityñski K, Grzanka P, Bazan-Socha S, Musail J. Actinomycosis mimicking advanced cancer. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2008;118:581–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Berardi RS. Abdominal actinomycosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;149:257–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sumer Y, Yilmaz B, Emre B, Ugur C. Abdominal mass secondary to actinomyces infection: an unusual presentation and its treatment. J Postgrad Med. 2004;50:115–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang CJ, Huang TJ, Hsieh JS. Pseudo-colonic carcinoma caused by abdominal actinomycosis: report of two cases. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2004;19:283–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagenlehner FM, Mohren B, Naber KG, Mannl HF. Abdominal actinomycosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9:881–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Alam MK, Khayat FA, Al-Kayali A, Al-Suhaibani YA. Abdominal actinomycosis: case reports. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2001;7:37–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Russo TA. Agents of actinomycosis. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 2280–8.Google Scholar
  28. Weese WC, Smith IM. A study of 57 cases of actinomycosis over a 36-year period. Arch Intern Med. 1975;135:1562–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang SH, Li AF, Lin JK. Colonoscopy in abdominal actinomycosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:236–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Brown JR. Human actinomycosis: a study of 181 subjects. Hum Pathol. 1973;4:319–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Srivastava A, Lauwers GY. Pathology of non-infective gastritis. Histopathology. 2007;50:15–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Das N, Lee J, Madden M, Elliot CS, Bateson P, Gilliland R. A rare case of abdominal actinomycosis presenting as an inflammatory pseudotumor. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;21:483–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Chattopadhyay P, Chatterjee S, Sen SK. Biotechnological potential of natural food grade biocolorants. Afr J Biotech. 2008;17:2972–85.Google Scholar
  34. Tunkel AR, Sepkowitz KA. Infections Caused by Viridans Streptococci in Patients with Neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(11):1524–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Brook I, Hunter V, Walker RI. Synergistic effects of anaerobic ccocci, Bacteroides, Clostridia, Fusobacteria, and anaerobic bacteria on mouse and induction of substances abscess. J Infect Dis. 1984;149:924–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Al-Obaidy et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement