This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Diagnostic accuracy of monoclonal antibody based serum immunoglobulin free light chain immunoassays in myeloma cast nephropathy
© Hutchison et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 16 January 2012
Accepted: 16 July 2012
Published: 9 August 2012
The development of serum immunoassays for the measurement of immunoglobulin free light chains has led to a paradigm shift in the diagnosis, assessment and monitoring of patients with plasma cell dyscrasias. The impact of these immunoassays which employ polyclonal antibodies was most notable for those patients who were previously classified as non-secretory multiple myeloma. Recently new monoclonal antibody based assays have become available. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic sensitivity of these new assays with those already in clinical practice.
Sera from 30 patients who present with severe acute kidney injury and multiple myeloma were identified for analysis. A head to head comparison of the two commercially available free light chains assays was then undertaken to determine if their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were comparable.
In this first assessment of the utility of these new assays, we found that one of 17 patients with a lambda monoclonal free light chain resulting in acute kidney injury were not identified and a further 12% of patients were wrongly classified as having levels below those associated with disease specific acute kidney injury.
These results suggest that caution should be applied to the use of new free light chain assays in the assessment of patients with a monoclonal gammopathy.
KeywordsAcute kidney injury Multiple myeloma Free light chain Cast nephropathy Serum immunoassays
The development of polyclonal nephelometric immunoassays for the measurement of free immunoglobulin light chains (FLC) in the serum has changed screening algorithms, classifications and the monitoring of a number of plasma cell dyscrasias[1–3]. These assays, which utilise latex-conjugated polyclonal antisera, when combined with serum protein electrophoresis provide a sensitive screening tool for plasma cell dyscrasias. Together they identify all cases of multiple myeloma, 96% of AL-amyloidosis and 85% of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). These FLC assays have a particular role for the diagnosis and monitoring of light chain only multiple myeloma, but in addition their sensitivity has lead to the development of a new classification of response of multiple myeloma: stringent complete response (when the FLC ratio has normalised, in addition to standard parameters). Furthermore the assessment of serum FLC provides an additional tool for the risk stratification of MGUS and asymptomatic myeloma and has allowed the description of a new class of FLC only MGUS.
Monoclonal serum FLC exhibit different inter-patient and intra-patient physio-chemical properties. This may reflect the genetic and biological diversity of the FLC’s and contribute to one of the most significant complications of monoclonal FLC, acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to cast nephropathy; when severe this has a profound impact on morbidity and mortality and reduces quality of life. The rapid diagnosis of AKI due to myeloma cast nephropathy facilitated by monoclonal FLC, allows the rapid initiation of disease specific treatment. Recent work has demonstrated that when treatments are targeted to provide a rapid reduction in circulating concentrations of monoclonal FLC renal recovery occurs in the majority of patients[12–15].
Recently, new immunoassays which use monoclonal antibodies against FLC have become commercially available. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic sensitivity of these new monoclonal assays with the established polyclonal FLC assays in the context of individuals presenting with new severe AKI secondary to multiple myeloma where there is a clear need for a rapid diagnosis.
Results and discussion
Summary for comparison of diagnostic accuracies between the two free light chain assays in patients with multiple myeloma and acute kidney injury
% misclassified by Siemens Test
Demographics of the 5 patients missed by the Siemens FLC assay
Misclassified FLC as <500 mg/L**
The correlation coefficient of the two FLC assays was less good for patients with monoclonal λ FLC (Figure1B) than for patients with monoclonal κ FLC (Figure1C): r = 0.617, p < 0.003 and r = 0.843, p = 0.001 respectively. The correlation of the FLC ratios between the two assays was 0.894, P < 0.01. The shortfalls in correlations of the absolute values of FLC are relevant for both the diagnosis and monitoring of patients. First, five of the 28 patients (18%) with AKI secondary to multiple myeloma were misclassified by the new assays as having FLC levels below the nephrotoxic threshold of 500 mg/L, four of these patients had a monoclonal λ FLC and one had a monoclonal κ FLC. Second, disease response as defined by the reduction in serum FLC levels is increasing in importance in all patients with multiple myeloma, but has particularly relevance in those with AKI where an early reduction in monoclonal FLC both guides treatment and suggests outcome[12–15]. It is imperative therefore that the established ‘risk’ and ‘response’ levels of the original FLC assays cannot be used for the new FLC assays. Rather levels specific for the new assays should now be identified. Clinicians will then need to be made aware of these new levels and informed which assay their laboratory is using.
The principal limitation of this work is the small population size. Further work should now be undertaken to assess these new monoclonal assays in larger populations and specific disease groups such as AL-amyloid, where the potentially inferior performance of the new λ assay may be of particular importance. In addition, the correlations between these assays are not robust enough to apply the current definitions of myeloma response based on FLC monoclonality from the new assays.
This study highlights the importance of large comparative studies of new immunoassays before they are used in clinical practice. This provisional work demonstrated that the new monoclonal N-latex assay for FLC measurement did not robustly replicate the results of the established polyclonal FLC assays. Further work is now required before these new assays can be adopted into clinical practice.
This study was undertaken as a service evaluation at the University Hospital Birmingham. All data analysis was coded and anonymised. Sera from patients, who presented with new dialysis dependent renal failure, to the renal unit at the University Hospital Birmingham, were screened for inclusion in a trial assessing the management of severe renal failure in multiple myeloma (COREC 05/Q2706/107, South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee), results of which have been reported previously[14, 18, 19].
Dialysis-dependent renal failure was defined as an estimated GFR of <15mls/min/1.73 m2, as calculated by the abbreviated MDRD equation and a clinical or metabolic requirement for dialysis as identified by the reviewing nephrologist. Attribution of the cause of renal failure to multiple myeloma was based on renal histology or in cases where a renal biopsy was contraindicated when all other potential causes were excluded. The clinical diagnosis of multiple myeloma was made by a consultant haematologist in accordance with international diagnostic criteria.
Laboratory and statistical analysis
Serum samples were stored at −80°C until thawed for the current study; previous work has demonstrated the stability of FLC concentrations in urine samples over many years and apparent stability in serum samples. Serum κ and λ FLC concentrations were measured by nephelometry, on a Dade-Behring BN™II Analyser, using particle-enhanced, high-specificity, homogeneous immunoassays (Freelite™, The Binding Site Group Ltd, Birmingham, UK and N-Latex FLC, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostic Products GmBh, Germany). FLC results were compared with the published reference range for the FLC ratio in patients with renal failure reference range (0.37-3.17).
Data were analysed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation of results between the two assays and Chi square test to assess the classification of the patients by the two assays.
- Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, et al.: International myeloma working group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia. 2009, 23: 215-224. 10.1038/leu.2008.307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV, et al.: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia. 2010, 24: 1121-1127. 10.1038/leu.2010.60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blade J, Dimopoulos M, Rosinol L, Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA: Smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: Current diagnostic criteria, new predictors of outcome, and follow-up recommendations. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28: 690-697. 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.2257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katzmann JA, Kyle RA, Benson J, et al.: Screening panels for detection of monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem. 2005, 55: 1517-1522.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, et al.: Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance. Blood. 2005, 106: 812-817. 10.1182/blood-2005-03-1038.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA, et al.: Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor of progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008, 111: 785-789. 10.1182/blood-2007-08-108357.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dispenzieri A, Katzmann JA, Kyle RA, et al.: Prevalence and risk of progression of light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a retrospective population based cohort study. Lancet. 2010, 375: 1721-1728. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60482-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bourne PC, Ramsland PA, Shan L, et al.: Three-dimensional structure of an immunoglobulin light chain dimer with amyoidogenic properties. Acta Crystallogr D: Biol Crystallogr. 2002, D58: 815-823.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harding S, Provot F, Beuscart J-B, Cook M, et al.: Aggregated serum free light chains may prevent adequate removal by high cut-off haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011, 26: 1438-1441. 10.1093/ndt/gfr019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanders PW, Booker BB: Pathobiology of cast nephropathy from human Bence Jones proteins. J Clin Invest. 1992, 89: 630-639. 10.1172/JCI115629.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA, Plant T, Drayson M, et al.: Serum free light chain measurement aids the diagnosis of myeloma in patients with severe renal failure. BMC Nephrol. 2008, 9: 11-10.1186/1471-2369-9-11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA, Cockwell P, Stringer S, et al.: Early reduction of serum-free light chains associates with renal recovery in myeloma kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011, 22: 1129-1136. 10.1681/ASN.2010080857.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Leung N, Gertz MA, Zeldenrust SR, et al.: Improvement of cast nephropathy with plasma exchange depends on the diagnosis and on reduction of serum free light chains. Kidney Int. 2008, 73: 1282-1288. 10.1038/ki.2008.108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA, Bradwell AR, Cook M, et al.: Treatment of acute renal failure secondary to multiple myeloma with chemotherapy and extended high cut-off hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009, 4: 745-754. 10.2215/CJN.04590908.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Burnette BL, Leung N, Rajkumar SV: Renal improvement in myeloma with bortezomib plus plasma exchange. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364: 1607-1616. 10.1056/NEJMoa1100356.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Velthuis TH, Knop I, Stam P: N Latex FLC – new monoclonal high-performance assays for the determination of free light chain kappa and lambda. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011, 49: 1323-1332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katzmann JA, Clark RJ, Abraham RS, et al.: Serum reference intervals and diagnostic ranges for free kappa and free lambda immunoglobulin light chains: Relative sensitivity for detection of monoclonal light chains. Clin Chem. 2002, 48: 1437-1444.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA, Cockwell P, Reid S, et al.: Efficient removal of immunoglobulin free light chains by hemodialysis for multiple myeloma: in vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007, 18: 886-895. 10.1681/ASN.2006080821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA, Harding S, Mead GP, et al.: Serum free-light chain removal by high cutoff hemodialysis: optimizing removal and supportive care. Artif Organs. 2008, 32: 910-917. 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2008.00653.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vorvoort G, Willems HL, Wetzels JF: Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in healthy subjects and normoalbuminuric diabetic patients: Validity of a new (MDRD) prediction equation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002, 17: 1909-1913. 10.1093/ndt/17.11.1909.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bird JM, Owen RG, D’Sa S, et al.: Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma 2011. Br J Haematol. 2011, 154: 32-75. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08573.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tencer J, Thysell H, Andersson K, Grubb A: Long-term stability of albumin, protein HC, immunoglobulin G, kappa- and lambda-chain-immunoreactivity, orosomucoid and alpha 1-antitrypsin in urine stored at −20 degrees C. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1997, 31: 67-71. 10.3109/00365599709070305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bradwell AR, Carr-Smith HD, Mead GP, et al.: Highly sensitive, automated immunoassay for immunoglobulin free light chains in serum and urine. Clin Chem. 2001, 47: 673-680.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hutchison CA, Harding S, Hewins P, et al.: Quantitative assessment of serum and urinary polyclonal free light chains in patients with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008, 3: 1684-1690. 10.2215/CJN.02290508.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6890/12/12/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.