Skip to main content

Table 3 Values of agreements between cytopathological diagnosis

From: Pelvic radiotherapy for cervical cancer affects importantly the reproducibility of cytological alterations evaluation

Patients Evaluation Exact Agreement Expected Agreement Weighted Kappa 95% Confidence Interval N
  K1 49.47% 45.74% 0.069 −0.05; 0.18 95
All K2 47.87% 44.11% 0.067 −0.05; 0.19 94
  K3 80.32% 59.40% 0.515 0.34; 0.68 94
  K1 51.00% 42.44% 0.149 −0.02;0.32 50
No K2 47.00% 39.78% 0.120 −0.04;0.31 50
RT K3 70.00% 43.18% 0.472 0.27;0.65 50
  K1 47.78% 46.91% 0.016 −0,03;0.06 45
RT K2 48.86% 46.69% 0.041 −0.01;0.09 44
  K3 84.09% 74.59% 0.374a 0.01;0.74 44
  1. aUnweighted kappa, Less than three order categories
  2. K1: original vs first re-evaluation; K2: original vs second re-evaluation; K3: first re-evaluation vs second re-evaluation; RT radiotherapy