Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Practice of percutaneous needle autopsy; a descriptive study reporting experiences from Uganda

Original Submission
5 Jul 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Janneke Cox
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amanjit Bal
29 Aug 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Roberts
13 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Janneke Cox
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Janneke Cox
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Janneke Cox
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
17 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Janneke Cox
Resubmission - Version 8
17 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
17 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Janneke Cox
Resubmission - Version 10
17 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 10
16 Nov 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Roberts
Resubmission - Version 11
Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
24 Nov 2014 Editorially accepted
3 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6890-14-44

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page