Peer Review reports
From: Tenascin-W is a better cancer biomarker than tenascin-C for most human solid tumors
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 12 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 12 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 12 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 12 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 11 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Guttery |
| 20 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Petra Richter |
| 10 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 10 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
| 15 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann |
| 16 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Guttery |
| Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
| 15 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
| Publishing | ||
| 27 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6890-12-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.