Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 22 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dean Troyer |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 1 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dr M Nadji |
| 6 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Bartels |
| 7 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luis Antón Aparicio |
| 1 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dean Troyer |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 1 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 29 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Luis Antón Aparicio |
| 4 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Bartels |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| 19 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Dean Troyer |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 19 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Dec 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 21 Dec 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6890-11-14 |
You can find further information about peer review here.