Skip to main content

Table 3 Number and percentage of cases with and without regional lymph node metastasis according to clinical and pathological variables

From: SOD2 immunoexpression predicts lymph node metastasis in penile cancer

   No lymph node metastasis Lymph node metastasis  
Variable Category N (%) N (%) P value
Age < 50 yo 26 (65.0) 14 (35.0) 0.682
  50 – 59 yo 27 (65.9) 14 (34.1)  
  ≥60 yo 21 (56.8) 16 (43.2)  
Palpable suspicious regional No 48 (84.2) 9 (15.8) <0.001
Lymph node Yes 24 (40.7) 35 (59.3)  
pT (TNM) pT1a 7 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0.045
  > pT1a 67 (60.4) 44 (39.6)  
Pattern of invasion Pushing 6 (46.2) 7 (53.8) 0.368
  Infiltrating 60 (61.9) 37 (38.1)  
Histological grade Grade 1 13 (86.7) 2 (13.3) 0.013
  Grade 2 30 (71.4) 12 (28.6)  
  Grade 3 31 (50.8) 30 (49.2)  
Perineural invasion No 59 (75.6) 19 (24.4) <0.001
  Yes 9 (26.5) 25 (73.5)  
Vascular invasion No 55 (68.8) 25 (31.2) 0.010
  Yes 13 (40.6) 19 (59.4)  
Invasion of corpora cavernous No 14 (66.7) 7 (33.3) 0.303
  Yes 28 (50.9) 27 (49.1)  
Invasion of corpora spongiosum No 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0) 1.000
  Yes 50 (60.2) 33 (39.8)  
Invasion of urethra No 26 (66.7) 13 (33.3) 0.436
  Yes 14 (56.0) 11 (44.0)  
Tumor depth ≤5 mm 18 (90.0) 2 (10.0) 0.002
  >5 mm 44 (51.2) 42 (48.8)  
HPV-16 No 64 (62.1) 39 (37.9) 1.000
  Yes 10 (66.7) 5 (33.3)  
HPV-18 No 68 (61.3) 43 (38.7) 0.255
  Yes 6 (85.7) 1 (14.3)  
SOD2 expression <50% 49 (75.4) 16 (24.6) 0.002
  >50% 25 (47.2) 28 (52.8)