Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Clinical Pathology

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Tenascin-W is a better cancer biomarker than tenascin-C for most human solid tumors

  • Florence Brellier1,
  • Enrico Martina1, 2, 6,
  • Martin Degen1, 2, 6,
  • Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc’h3, 4,
  • Agnès Petit4,
  • Thomas Kryza3, 4,
  • Yves Courty4,
  • Luigi Terracciano5,
  • Christian Ruiz5 and
  • Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann1, 2Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Clinical Pathology201212:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-12-14

Received: 9 April 2012

Accepted: 27 August 2012

Published: 4 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Apr 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Apr 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Guttery
20 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Petra Richter
10 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
15 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ruth Chiquet-Ehrismann
16 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Guttery
Resubmission - Version 10
15 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
27 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
4 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6890-12-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Novartis Research Foundation
(2)
Faculty of Sciences, University of Basel
(3)
Université François Rabelais
(4)
Centre d'Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires
(5)
Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel
(6)
Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Skin Disease Research Center, Harvard Medical School

Advertisement