Testing for hereditary thrombophilia: a retrospective analysis of testing referred to a national laboratory
© Jackson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 12 November 2007
Accepted: 02 April 2008
Published: 02 April 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Nov 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|21 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Brian Jackson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joseph Caprini|
|24 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Cooper|
|13 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - W Craig Hooper|
|31 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Brian Jackson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|31 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|4 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - W Craig Hooper|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 Apr 2008||Editorially accepted|
|2 Apr 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-8-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.