External quality assurance as a revalidation method for pathologists in pediatric histopathology: Comparison of four international programs
© Sergi and Mikuz; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 20 February 2008
Accepted: 12 November 2008
Published: 12 November 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Feb 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Furness|
|18 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gunnar Nordin|
|21 May 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emmanuel Favaloro|
|16 Jul 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Consolato Sergi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jul 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gunnar Nordin|
|12 Aug 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Emmanuel Favaloro|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Oct 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Consolato Sergi|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|29 Oct 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|12 Nov 2008||Editorially accepted|
|12 Nov 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-8-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.