Skip to main content

The possible role of cell cycle regulators in multistep process of HPV-associated cervical carcinoma

Abstract

Background

Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and 18 are associated with cervical carcinogenesis through an interaction between HPV oncogenic proteins and cell cycle regulatory genes. However, the exact pathogenetic mechanisms are not determined yet.

Methods

We investigated 43 invasive squamous cell carcinoma (ISCC), 38 CIN III, 11 CINII and 18 CINI for cyclin D1, cyclin E, CDK4, p53, mdm-2, p21 waf , p27, p16 INK 4A, Rb and Ki-67 aberrations using immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques. Twenty samples of normal cervical tissues (NCT) were taken as a control.

Results

There was a significant increase in the expression of Ki-67, cyclin E, CDK4, p16 INK 4A , Rb (p= 0.003, 0.001, 0.001, 0.01) and a significant decrease in p27 KIP 1from NCT to ISCC (p = 0.003). Increased cyclin D1, p21 waf , p53, mdm-2 expression, homozygous deletion (HZD) and promoter methylation (PM) of the Rb were detected in CINIII and ISCC only. On univariate analysis; tumor size, differentiation, lymph node status, FIGO stage, Ki- 67, cyclin D1, p53 and p27 KIP 1are significantly associated with reduced overall survival (OS) while on multivariate analysis; only FIGO stage, Ki-67, cyclin D1, p53 and p27 KIP 1were significant.

Conclusion

1) Aberrations involving p27 KIP 1, cyclin E, CDK4, p16 INK 4Aare considered early events in HPV 16 and 18-associated cervical carcinoma, whereas cyclin D1 and p53 pathway abnormalities are considered late events. 2) Immunohistochemical tests for p16 INK 4A and cyclin E, could help in early diagnosis of cervical carcinoma. 3) Only FIGO stage p53, cyclin D1, p27 KIP 1and Ki-67 are independent prognostic factors that might help in predicting outcome of cervical cancer patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Carcinoma of the uterine cervix emerges from a defined series of prenoplastic lesions with increasing cellular dysplasia referred to as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade I, II and III [1]. A large body of knowledge supports the view that high risk HPV types (HR-HPV) are strongly associated with invasive squamous cell carcinoma (ISCC) and its precursors as they have the ability to transform normal cervical cells into neoplastic ones [2]. HPV 16 and 18 are the most commonly detected HR-HPV types in these lesions, and therefore their detection was proposed as a useful surrogate marker to diagnose cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ (CIS) [2, 3].

Progress in cervical cancer research provided evidence that integration of HR-HPV DNA into the host cell genome results in elevated expression levels of the E6 and E7 proteins with subsequent interaction between these oncogenic proteins and the cell cycle machinery [2, 4]. Expression of E6 and E7 proteins of HR-HPV types induces immortalization of cells through their inhibitory effects on the tumor suppressor proteins pRb and p53; respectively, altering the cell cycle control and leading to chromosomal instability [2]. Undermining of pRb growth-inhibitory role with release of E2F transcription factors render the cells independent of mitogenic stimuli [5], whereas inactivation of the p53 precludes its role as one of the major factors controlling cell proliferation since it arrests the cell cycle in response to DNA damage or direct the damaged cell to an apoptotic pathway. This function is abolished via p53 degradation by the E6 protein of oncogenic HPV types or via cytoplasmic sequestration by complexing to mdm-2 protein [6].

However the E6-p53 and E7-Rb model is not sufficient to inevitably produce cervical carcinoma although it has resulted in the identity of the viral gene's actions on numerous cellular proteins and processes normally involved in cellular growth and proliferation. This is evidenced by the spontaneous clearance of HPV infection and the long delay between the onset of persistent infection and the emergence of malignancy. Recent studies show an association between HR-HPV types and cell cycle regulators [2, 7]. The cell cycle is governed by a family of cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) and their inhibitors (CDKIs) through activating and inactivating phosphorylation events. Attention has been focused on altered expression of G1 cyclins and Cdks because the major regulatory events leading to cell proliferation and differentiation occur within the G1 phase of the cell cycle. The D-type cyclins reach maximum levels of expression and form functional kinase complexes with CDK4 or CDK6; during the mid-G1 phase, whereas cyclin-E is expressed and associated with Cdk2 in an active complex near the G1-S boundary [5, 8]. Active CDK/cyclin complex can be regulated by binding to CDKI (p16 INK 4A , p21 waf 1and p27 KIP 1) and inhibit cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase [7].

Deregulation of p16 INK 4A , p21 waf 1and p27 KIP 1has recently been reported in various human tumors. In HPV-associated cervical carcinoma, the expression and function of these proteins is supposed to be impaired by the action of viral oncopoteins E6 and E7 [9]. However, it is unclear how and when factors that are innate to the HPV-infected cells including genetic aberrations launch the host cell into an irreversible progression to cancer [7].

Therefore, we attempted to assess the contribution of cyclin D1, cyclin E, CDK4, p53, mdm-2, p21 waf , Rb, p27 KIP 1 , p16 INK 4Aand Ki-67 expression to the development of HPV16/18-associated cervical carcinoma and to determine at what stage of carcinogenesis these aberrations start to manifest. The prognostic value of these aberrations was also investigated in relation to the standard clinicopathological prognostic factors and overall survival.

Methods

Clinical samples

The study included 110 fresh-frozen tissue samples that were selected from a total of 200 based on the positivity for HPV16 and/or18 and on the availability of clinical and follow-up data. The studied cases included 43 invasive squamous cell carcinoma (ISCC), 38 cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) III, 11 CINII and 18 CINI cases were collected from patients who were diagnosed and treated at the hospitals of Kasr El-Aini School of Medicine and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University during March 1999- July 2003 after a recent evidence of abnormal cervical cytology and/or conization biopsy (obtained by large loop excision of the transformation zone). Cases of ISCC were examined by two independent pathologists, classified and graded according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and staged according to criteria of the International Federation of Gynecolology and Obstetrics (FIGO) [10]. The clinicopathological features of the studied cases are illustrated in table 1. Twenty normal cervical tissues (NCT) obtained from patients undergoing hysterectomy for medical conditions not related to the cervix were included in the study as a control. All control samples showed normal cervical cytology and histology and all were negative for HPV by PCR. In ISCC and CIN samples, only cases with ≥ 75% tumor cells were included in the study. A written consent was obtained from all patients prior to enrollment in the study, and the ethical committee of the NCI approved the protocol which was in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

Table 1 Clinicopathologic features of invasive squamous cell carcinoma cases in relation to different studied markers.

Cell lines

The HPV16 (SiHa), HPV18 (HeLa) positive cervical carcinoma and the mdm2 positive (SA-1) cell lines (from Institute of Human Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Sigma, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma, USA) and used as controls.

DNA extraction

High molecular weight DNA was extracted from fresh tumor and normal samples as well as cell lines, according to standard protocols [11].

HPV detection and typing

The purified DNA was subjected to PCR amplification using general-purpose HPV primers (GP5+ and GP6+) which amplify conserved sequences in the HPV-L1 region (150 bp) as previously described [12]. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel, transferred onto a nylon membrane (Hybond N +, Amersham) and analyzed using digoxigenin-labelled type-specific probes by chemiluminescent detection (ELOCA). The HPV probe consisted of a cocktail of 14 high-risk mucosal types [16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 62, 66, and 68] and two low-risk types [6 and 11].

Immunohistochemistry

Tumors and normal tissue samples were put in 10% neutral buffered formalin and processed routinely for preparation of hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and for immunohistochemical studies. Five micron thick sections were cut onto positive-charged slides and used for immunohistochemical detection of cyclin D1, cyclin E, CDK4, p53, mdm-2, p21 waf,p27 KIP 1 , p16 INK 4A , Rb, and Ki-67. The standard streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase detection technique was performed using the antibodies illustrated in table 2. Briefly, after deparaffinization in xylene and rehydration through graded alcohols, sections were microwaved in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 15 min. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by immersion in 0.03% H2O2 in methyl alcohol for 30 min and 10% normal rabbit (for mouse primary antibodies) or goat serum (for rabbit primary antibodies) was applied to avoid non-specific reaction. Sections were then incubated with the primary antibodies or with non-immunized mouse or rabbit serum for the negative control at 4°C. After washing with PBS, biotinylated anti-muse or rabbit IgG was applied for 30 min at room temperature. The peroxidase-conjugated-streptavidin solution was applied for 30 min and visualized using 0.05% 3'-3' diaminobenziine (DAB). Counterstaining was performed with Meyer's hematoxylin [13].

Table 2 Summary of specific antisera and immunohistochemistry conditions

Only a distinct brown nuclear staining was scored positive. In NCT, cyclin D1; cyclin E and CDK were focaly expressed in the parabasal cells only, there was no immunostaining for p53 and mdm-2, p21 wafwas focally detected, p27 KIP 1was normally detected in > 50% of the cells and Rb was detected in all NCT samples. This was the normal expression pattern for the studied protein [8]. An aberrant expression of cyclin D1, cyclin E, CDK4, p21 wafand p16 INK 4Awas defined as staining in excess of normal tissues (> 20% for cyclin D1; cyclin E, CDK4 and > 10% for p21 waf and p16 INK 4A) (Figure 1). p53 and mdm-2 overexpression was considered with > 10% positive cells. L oss of p27 KIP 1was defined as staining in < 50% of the cells and altered expression of Rb was defined as absence of nuclear staining in all sections examined [8]. Four semiquantitative classes were used to describe the percentage of positively-stained tumor cells: negative (no cells stained); +: minimaly positive (1–10% positive cells); ++: moderately positive (10–50% positive cells); and +++: markedly positive (> 50% positive cells). The positivity of each stain including Ki-67 was also described as a positivity index (PI) which indicated the number of positive cells in 1000 arbitrarily selected, manually counted cells at 200× magnification [4, 6, 13].

Figure 1
figure 1

a) Positive immunostaining for p27 KIP 1 i n the nuclei of normal cervical tissue, b) positive immunostaining for p27 KIP 1in CINI, c) lack of p27 KIP 1immunostaining in a case of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, d) positive immunostaining for p16 INK 4Ain a case of CINII, e) positive immunostaining for p16 INK 4Ain a case of III, f) negative nuclear imminostaining for cyclinD1 in normal cervical tissue except in the parabasal cells, g) a strongly positive immunostaining for cyclinD1 in a case of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, h) positive nuclear immunostaining for Rb in parabasal and intermediate squamous cells in hyperplastic squamous epithelium, and i) focal and weak nuclear staining for Rb in a case of invasive squamous cell carcinoma.

Determination of p53 gene status

Exons 5–9 of the p53 gene were amplified separately using p53 Gene Analysis Kit (Visible Genetics Inc., Toronto, Canada) in all studied cases. Briefly, 3 ul of genomic DNA were added to a 25-μl PCR mixture according to manufacturer's instructions and then cycled through 35 cycles consisting of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s in a thermo-cycler (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). PCR products were then visualized by electrophoresis in an ethidium bromide-stained 1% agarose gel. Single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) was performed as previously described [14]. All PCR samples with aberrant conformers on SSCP were sequenced using nested CY5/CY5.5-labeled primers provided in the p53 Gene Analysis Kit (Visible Genetics Inc., Toronto, Canada) according to supplier's instructions and analyzed using the MicroGene Blaster Automated DNA electrophoresis unit (Visible Genetics Inc., Toronto, Canada)

Determination of cyclin D1, cyclin E and CDK4 gene status was performed using the differential PCR assay (DPA) as previously described with GAPDH as an internal control [15].

Detection of DNA methylation in CpG islands of the Rb gene was done using a methylation specific PCR. Homozygous deletion (HZD) was assessed using a semiquantitative differential PCR as described by Nakamura et al. [16].

Determination of p16 gene mutation

The presence of p16 gene mutations was assessed using the SSCP/sequencing according to Tripathi et al. [17].

mdm-2 gene amplification was assessed using the primer sequence and PCR conditions of Oda et al [18] with phenyl alanine hydroxylase (PAH) as an internal control. The level of mdm-2 gene amplification was determined by comparing the intensities of the mdm-2 and PAH-PCR products for each of the samples with SA-1 cells as a positive control (seven folds). Samples showing more than 2 fold amplification were considered positive.

Statistical methods

Statistical analysis was performed using the Stat View 4.5 software package (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). The Mann-Whitney non parametric test was used to compare the PIs of pairs of subjects and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for categorical data. Correlation between the indexes was determined by a simple linear regression test. Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank tests were used for the survival analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling were performed with overall survival (OS) as the end point. The median time of follow-up was 11.6 months for all patients and 33.5 months for survivors. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Ki-67 expression

The positivity index for Ki-67 was significantly increased with progression from NCT (< 0.1) to ISCC (40.5 ± 11) (p = 0.003). Ki-67 expression in CINI was significantly higher than in NCT (p = 0.01) (Figure 2d & Table 3).

Table 3 The level of protein expression of different studied markers in normal, dysplastic and neoplastic cervical epithelium detected by immunohistochemistry
Figure 2
figure 2

Cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma showing a) strong nuclear immunostaining for p53, b) diffuse nuclear staining for mdm2, c) positive nuclear immunostaining for p21 WAFand, d) positive immunostaining for ki-67.

Expression of cyclins and CDK

Cyclin D1 overexpression was detected in CINIII and ISCC cases only. All samples positive for cyclin D1 expression were scored (++) except for 6 cases of ISCC that scored (+++). The PI was significantly higher in ISCC than in CINIII (p = 0.001). Cyclin E expression was significantly increased from CINI (16.7%; 18 ± 1.1) to ISCC (88.4% PI = 97 ± 13.8), (p = 0.001). Similarly, CDK4 expression was significantly increased from CINI to ISCC (p = 0.001) (Figure 1f, 1g & Table 3).

On the other hand, cyclin D1 gene amplification was detected in 20 (46.5%) ISCC and 7 (18.4%) CINIII cases (The concordance between both techniques was 90 %). Cyclin E gene amplification was detected in 2 cases (11.1%) of CINI, 5 (45.5%) CINII, 21 (55.3%) CINIII and 38 (88.4%) ISCC (The concordance between both techniques was 97%). CDK4 gene amplification was detected in 2 cases of CINI, 4 cases of CINII, 15 cases of CINIII and 39 cases of ISCC (The concordance between both techniques was 96%) (Figures 3, 4, 5).

Figure 3
figure 3

An ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel for CDK4 gene amplification, lane 1: molecular weight marker (MW), lanes 2–7: cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, lanes 8–12: CIN cases, lanes 13–14: normal cervical tissue samples, lane 15: a negative control. Lanes 2, 3, 8 show CDK4 gene amplification.

Figure 4
figure 4

An ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel for cyclinD1 gene amplification, lane 1: MW, lanes 2–8: cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, lanes 9–14: CIN cases, lanes 15–16: normal cervical tissue samples. Lanes 2,4,6,8,10,12,14 show cyclinD1 gene amplification.

Figure 5
figure 5

An ethidium bromide-stained 2% agarose gel for cyclinE gene amplification, lane 1: MW, lanes 2–4: normal cervical tissue samples, lanes 5–9: CIN cases, lanes 10–14: cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Lanes 10, 13, 14 show cyclinE gene amplification.

Figure 6
figure 6

An ethidium bromide-stained 4% agarose gel for Rb gene methylation lane 1: methylated control, lane 18: unmethylted control, lanes 8–12: cases of invasive squamous cell carcinoma, lanes 12–17: CIN cases.

Expression of CDKIs

Nuclear immunoreactivity for p21 wafwas sporadically detected in NCT, CINI and CINII. However, diffuse staining for p21 wafwas detected in CINIII and ISCC. There was a significant difference in the PI of p21 wafbetween CINII and CINIII as well as between CINIII and ISCC (p = 0.01) (Figure 2c & Table 3).

p27 Kip 1expression was significantly decreased with disease progression (p = 0.003). The protein was found in all NCT and CINI, in 63.6% of CINII, 26.3% of CINIII and in 13.9%of ISCC (Figure 1a–c & Table 3).

p16 INK 4Aoverexpression was detected in 4 CINII, 24 CINIII and 40 ISCC. The PI was significantly higher in ISCC than in CINIII (p = 0.01) (Figure 1d, 1e & table 3). Although abnormal conformers were detected in 3 ISCC cases by SSCP, no mutations were found in any of them by sequencing.

p53 gene status

p53 overexpression was detected in 18.4% CINIII and 44.2% ISCC cases only (Table 3). All positive CIN cases were scored (++) except for a single case that was scored (+) whereas 11 ISCC cases were scored (+++), 5 were (++) and 3 were (+). There was a significant difference in the PI between CINIII and ISCC (p = 0.01) (Figure 2a).

p53 gene mutations were detected in 5 (11.6%) cases of ISCC only, 3 of them showed protein overexpression. Four cases showed mutations in exon 7 (one had mutation in codon 240 [AGT → ATT, S → I] and 3 in codon 249 [AGG → AGT, A → S]) and the remaining case showed double mutations in exons 5 (codon 132, 1 bp deletion) and exon 8 (codon 290 [CGC → AGC, S → A]) (Figure 7). None of the normal cervical tissue samples or cases of CINI-III showed p53 gene mutations.

Figure 7
figure 7

A case of ISCC showing mutation in exon 7 of the p53 gene codon 247 by single stranded conformation polymorphism and sequence analysis.

mdm-2 gene status

mdm-2 overexpression was detected in CINIII and ISCC cases only. All CINIII cases were scored (++) whereas in ISCC, 17 cases were scored (+++) and 5 were (++). There was a significant difference in the PI between CINIII and ISCC (p = 0.01) (Figure 2b & Table 3). mdm-2 gene amplification was reported in 9 CINIII cases and in 20 ISCC cases. The concordance between both techniques was 95.1%.

Rb gene status

Normal expression of the Rb protein was reported in all NCT and CINI, whereas altered expression was detected in 6 (54.5%) CINII cases, 21 (55.2%) CINIII and 29 (67.4%) ISCC. There was a significant difference in the PI between NCT and CINII (P = 0.031), CINII and CINIII (p = 0.021) and between CINIII and ISCC (p = 0.021) (Figure 1h, 1i & Table 3). HZD of the Rb gene was found in 20 (46.5%) ISCC cases whereas PM was detected in 15 (39.5%) CINIII and in 26 (60.5%) ISCC (Figure 6).

Clinical correlations

There was a significant correlation between altered expression of Rb and p16 INK 4A(p < 0.001), p53 and mdm2 overexpression (p = 0.003), cyclin D1 and CDK4 (p = 0.001) as well as between increased cyclin E and reduced p27 Kip 1expression in all studied groups (p = 0.011).

In the group of ISCC, there was significant relationship between p53,mdm2 and tumor size (p = 0.003), and between type (p = 0.01), as well as between p53 overexpression and lymphovascular invasion, and FIGO stage (p = 0.003). Similarly, there was a significant association between reduced p27 Kip 1, tumor size, tumor type (p = 0.047), positive lymph node, stromal invasion (p = 0.001&p = 0.024) and FIGO stage (p = 0.002); between p21 wafoverexpression and tumor size (p = 0.001) and vaginal involvement (p = 0.042). Increased cyclin D1 was significantly associated with tumor size (p = 0.003) and FIGO stage (p = 0.008) whereas, increased cyclin E expression was significantly associated with tumor size (p = 0.001). A high Ki-67 index was significantly associated with tumor size, lymph node involvement and FIGO stage (Table 1).

For overall survival on univariate analysis, tumor size (p = 0.033), tumor differentiation (p = 0.047), lymph node status (p = 0.021), FIGO stage (p = 0.011), a high Ki-67 (p = 0.034), cyclinD1 overexpression (p = 0.011), p53 overexpression (p = 0.04) and reduced p27 (p = 0.023) were significant (Table 4). However, multivariate analysis revealed that FIGO stage (RR 4.211, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.281- 158.21, p = 0.003), Ki-67 (RR 1.527, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.025- 20.7, p = 0.046) and cyclin D1 overexpression (RR 1.296, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.029- 127.67, p = 0.008), p53 overexpression (RR 0.296, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.460- 120.944, p = 0.001) and p27 KIP 1loss (RR 3.650, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.307- 17.67, p = 0.014), were significant (Table 5)

Table 4 Univariate analysis of the clinicopathological factors and tested markers for overall survival
Table 5 Multivariate analysis of the clinicopathological factors and tested markers for overall survival

Discussion

The present study is the first to investigate the role of a large panel of cell cycle regulatory genes in Egyptian patients with cervical carcinoma both at the gene and protein levels. The studied population was homogeneous since all patients with CIN and ISCC were positive for HPV16 and/or 18. Tissue samples representing the different stages of transformation of normal cervical epithelium into ISCC have been analyzed for the possible role of the studied markers in etiopathogenesis of cervical carcinoma and their prognostic value.

It has been shown that the E6 and E7 proteins of HR-HPV types disrupt cell cycle checkpoints, particularly affecting CDKI linked to the G1- and G2-checkpoints with consequent accumulation of genetic aberrations [19]. To our knowledge, the role of cyclins, CDKs and CDKI in ISCC and its precursor lesions is not well defined yet. Moreover no single study has investigated the contribution of these proteins together and in association with other cell cycle related genes such as p53, Rb and mdm-2. In the present study aberrant expression of CDKs and their inhibitors were detected at several points during the transformation of HPV-infected cervical epithelium.

Cyclin D1 amplification and protein overexpression were found in 46.5% and 41.9% of our ISCC cases as well as in18.4% and 13.15% of CINIII cases only. Our results are in agreement with Nicholas et al. [19] and Cheung et al. [15]. In contrast, Bae et al. [20] reported reduced cyclin D1 mRNA and protein expression in cases of CIN and ISCC compared to NCT. It is difficult to explain the controversy between our results and those of Bae et al. [20]. However, their study is one of the very few studies showing reduced cyclin D1 in cervical carcinoma. Moreover, they reported increased cyclin D1 expression with increasing severity of the lesion from high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (HSIL) to ISCC which makes a higher expression in normal epithelium compared to the neoplastic one unlikely.

Our study shows a stepwise increase in the expression level of CDK4 from normal to tumor tissues indicating an important role for CDK4 at an early stage of transformation of HPV- infected cervical epithelium. Our results confirm the few available reports in this context [15, 8]. Although it is well known that cyclinD1 is necessary for the activation of CDK, the concordance reported in the present study between CDK4 and cyclin D1 expression was 49% only. We also detected increased CDK4 expression in cases of CINI and CINII although these cases did not show simultaneous increase in cyclin D1. This could be explained by the involvement of other D-type cyclins such as cyclin D2 and 3 in the activation of CDK4 [21]. Alternatively, the D type cyclins may not be required at all for G1 progression in HPV-transformed cervical epithelium since binding of HPV E7 protein to Rb leads to release of E2F transcription factor omitting the role of cyclin D1 in cell cycle progression [19].

Our results denote an important role for cyclin E in the early stages of HPV-associated cervical carcinogenesis since protein overexpression and gene amplification were detected during progression from NCT into ISCC. We also noticed a significant association between increased cyclin E expression and reduced p27 kip 1. Our data confirm the results of Dellas et al [21] who demonstrated a feed back inhibitory loop between cyclin E and p27 kip 1. This suggests the presence of a synergistic effect between both genes which will eventually lead to enhanced progression through the cell cycle as a consequence of the proliferative effect induced by increased cyclin E expression and the loss of the inhibitory function of p27 kip 1.

Inactivation of CDKIs (p27 kip 1, p21 waf , p16 INK 4A) via reduced expression was reported in various human tumors [22]. In HPV-associated cervical carcinoma, the situation is less clear since some studies showed that the tumor suppressor activity of these proteins is overcome through the action of the viral oncogenes E6/E7 without any change in their expression level [22], others showed that this applies to p21 wafand p27 kip 1only whereas p16 INK 4Ais usually down regulated [22–24]. Moreover, the HR-HPV types were shown to impair the function but not the expression of the p21 wafand p16 INK 4Aby rendering them insensitive to cyclin-CDK complex formation whereas p27 KIP 1is usually down-regulated [24].

In the present work, a stepwise decrease in p27 kip 1expression and a stepwise increase in p16 INK 4Awere found in cervical epithelium as it progressed from normal to a neoplastic one. Our results regarding p27 kip 1expression are in agreement with previously published data [8, 24–26]. In contrast, Shiozawa et al., [27] reported in their study a strong p27 kip 1expression in normal cervical epithelia which was markedly reduced to a negligible level in CIN samples. However, in ISCC cases they reported an increased expression of p27 kip 1and demonstrated that the p27 protein was bound to cdk2 and cyclin E. Consequently, the authors concluded that, p27 kip 1expression may be involved in the growth regulation of NCT however aberrant function of the p27 kip 1may occur in ISCC of the cervix. Although we can not find a proper explanation for this discrepancy in the results, we assume that the mechanism proposed by Shiozawa et al. [27] might represent an alternative pathway for p27 kip 1inactivation in ISCC of the uterine cervix through binding and sequestration by cdk2 and cyclin E which render it inactive just as the case with p53 and mdm2.

In our study, p16 INK 4Aoverexpression was detected during the early stages of cervical carcinogenesis although no mutation was reported in any of the studied cases. We therefore assume that inactivation of p16 INK 4Agene in HPV-associated ISCC is possibly achieved via mechanism(s) other than gene mutations. Among which is the binding to- and sequestration by other cellular and/or viral proteins. Our results are consistent with Volgareva et al. [22] and Tringler et al. [28] who reported p16 INK 4Aoverexpression in a high percentage of dysplastic and neoplastic lesions of the cervix uteri. They also mentioned that p16 INK 4Acould be used as a surrogate marker for early diagnosis of cervical carcinoma. However, our results regarding p16 INK 4Agene mutations in ISCC contrast with Tripathi et al. [17] who reported p16 INK 4Agene mutation in 15% of their ISCC cases. A difference in sampling methods, clinical and virological features of studied cases or a racial difference could be mentioned as possible explanations for the controversial results between the two studies.

An interesting finding in this study is the significant increase of p21 wafwhich was recognized at CINIII and ISCC cases only. Although it is expected that increased expression of p21 wafshould suppress the progression of cells in the cell cycle and consequently suppress cell growth, all the cases that revealed p21 wafoverexpression had a high Ki-67 positivity index. Several explanations could be mentioned in this regard including: 1) the interaction between HPV E7 oncoprotein and p21 wafwhich abrogates its inhibitory effect on cyclin/CDK4 activities, 2) the occurrence of checkpoint adaptation after constant stimulation, 3) altered or inhibited binding to the CDK4/cyclin D1 complex, or 4) mutations in downstream targets of p21 waf[3, 8, 10, 28].

Our study is the first to assess RB gene HZD and PM in addition to altered protein expression in cervical carcinoma and its premalignant lesions. We detected altered Rb expression in the early stages of cervical carcinogenesis whereas PM and HZD were reported in CINIII and ISCC only. Therefore, we assume that altered protein expression in the early stages of neoplastic transformation could be attributed to mechanism(s) other than gene deletion or silencing by PM. Degradation by HPV-E7, sequestration by other cellular proteins or inactivation by yet unidentified mechanism(s) could be mentioned in this context. Our results regarding altered Rb expression are consistent with the few available reports in this context [3, 8, 28].

Since all ISCC cases are HPV-16 or 18 positive, it is not expected to find accumulation of the p53 nor the p53-induced proteins in these cases. However, elevated levels of p53 and p21 wafproteins were seen in a relatively high fraction of cervical cancer together with mdm-2 in CINIII and ISCC cases. Our data are comparable to Tsuda et al. [29] and Huang et al. [30] who found p53 overexpression in 11.4% and 40.5% of HSIL compared to 56.6% and 30.7% of ISCC cases; respectively. Previous studies on ISCC showed that p53 overexpression is not usually associated with gene mutation but with sequestration by cellular or viral proteins of which mdm-2 is a highly possible candidate. This is in agreement with our results where p53 mutations were detected in 4 cases only whereas mdm-2 over-expression was present in 51.2% of ISCC, 13.7% CIN.

In gynecologic oncology, valid prognostic factors are necessary to define biologically similar subgroups for analysis of therapeutic efficiency. In the present study cyclin D1, p27, p53 and a high Ki-67 showed a prognostic relevance as increased expression of cyclin D1, p53 and Ki-67 as well as loss of p27 were highly correlated with the standard clinicopathologic prognostic factors for ISCC and they were significantly associated with reduced OS. Our data regarding the prognostic value of cyclin D1 and p53 are in agreement with Bae et al. [20] and Huang et al. [30], respectively who demonstrated that cyclin D1 and p53 overexpression are associated with decreased disease free survival (DFS) and OS rates. Similarly, our data regarding p27 are consistent with previous reports [16, 22] which considered p27 KIP 1an independent prognostic factor that significantly correlates with poor survival in ISCC.

We conclude that, infection of cervical mucosa by HPV16 and 18 leads to deregulation of the cell cycle via altering the expression level of certain genes. Whereas p27 KIP 1, cyclin E, CDK4, p16 INK 4Aand Rb aberrations are early events; cyclin D1, mdm-2, p53 and p21 waf aberrations occur late in cervical carcinogenesis (Figure 8). Together, these alterations lead to acceleration of the cell cycle with increased proliferation rate, as indicated by a high Ki-67 PI, and acquisition of more genetic damage. Our results also provide evidence that the application of immunohistochemical tests for p16 INK 4A , cyclin E, p27 KIP 1could help in early diagnosis of cervical carcinoma since alterations affecting the expression level of these proteins occur at an early stage of cervical carcinogenesis. Therefore they could be used as surrogate markers for early detection of ISCC and for monitoring patients with cervical dysplasia. On the other hand, p53, cyclin D1, p27 KIP 1and Ki-67 are independent prognostic factors in cervical cancer that could be used for predicting the clinical outcome of those patients.

Figure 8
figure 8

The percentage of protein expression of different studied markers in the studied groups.

Conclusion

It seems that aberrations involving p27 KIP 1, cyclin E, CDK4, p16 INK 4Aare early events in HPV 16- and 18-associated cervical carcinoma, whereas cyclin D1 and p53 pathway abnormalities are late events. The use of immunohistochemical tests for p16 INK 4A and cyclin E, may be of help in early diagnosis of cervical carcinoma. To predict the disease outcome of cervical cancer patients, only FIGO stage p53, cyclin D1, p27 KIP 1and Ki-67 are independent prognostic factors.

Abbreviations

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

ISCC:

squamous cell carcinoma

NCT:

Normal cervical tissues

HZD:

homozygous deletion

PM:

Promoter Methylation

OS:

Overall survival

HR-HPV:

High risk HPV types

CIS:

Carcinoma in situ

CDKs:

cyclin dependent kinases

CDKIs:

cyclin dependent kinases inhibitors

NCI:

National Cancer Institute

WHO:

World Health Organization

FIGO:

International Federation of Gynecolology and Obstetrics

DAB:

3'-3' diaminobenziine

PAH:

Phenyl alanine hydroxylase

HSIL:

High grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia

LNK-SCC:

Large non-keratinized squamous cell carcinoma

LK-SCC:

Large keratinized squamous cell carcinoma

SmCC:

Small cell carcinoma

PI:

Positivity index.

References

  1. Klaes R, Woerner SM, Ridder R, Wentzensen N, Duerst M, Schneider A, Lotz B, Melsheimer P, Von Knebel Doeberitz M: Detection of high risk cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer by amplification of transcripts derived from integrated papillomavirus oncogenes. Cancer res. 1999, 59: 6132-9616.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Clarke B, Chetty R: Cell cycle aberrations in the pathogenesis of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2001, 82 (2): 238-246. 10.1006/gyno.2001.6306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Howley PM, Scheffner M, Munger K: Oncoproteins encoded by the cancer-associated papillomavirus target the products of retinoblastoma and p53 tumor suppressor genes. Quant Biol. 1991, 56: 149-155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Masumoto T, Fuji T, Ishikawa M, Saito M, Iwata T, Fukuchi T, Susumu N, Mukai M, Kubushiro K, Tsukazaki K, Nozawa S: p16 overexpression and human papillomavirus infection in small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Hum Pathol. 2003, 34: 778-783. 10.1016/S0046-8177(03)00284-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spitokovsky D, Aengeneyndt F, Braspenning J, Doeberitz VK: P53-independent growth regulation of cervical cancer cells by the papillomvirus E6 oncogene. Ocogene. 1996, 13: 1027-1035.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giannoudis A, Herrington CS: Differential expression of p53 and p21 in low grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions infected with low, intermediate, and high risk human papillomavirus. Cancer. 2000, 89 (6): 1300-1307. 10.1002/1097-0142(20000915)89:6<1300::AID-CNCR15>3.0.CO;2-U.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Motoyama S, Ladines-llave CA, Villaneueva SL, Maruo T: The role of human papilloma virus in the molecular biology of cervical varcinogenesis. Kobe J Med Sci. 2004, 50 (1): 9-19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Skomedal H, Kristensen GB, Lie AK, Holm R: Aberrant expression of the cell cycle associated proteins TP53, MDM-2, P21, P27, cdK4, cyclin D1, RB, and EGFR in cervical carcinomas. Gynecol Oncolo. 1999, 73 (2): 223-228. 10.1006/gyno.1999.5346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mishina T, Dosaka-Akita H, Hommura F, et al: Cyclin E expression, a potential prognostic marker for non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 11-16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization Classification of Tumor: Pathology and Genetics. Tumors of the breast and female genital organs. Edited by: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P. IARC Press Lyon, 260-289.

  11. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 9.16-9.23. 2

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobs MV, de Roda Husman AM, van den Brule AJ, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ, Walboomers JM: Group-specific differentiation between high- and low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes by general primer-mediated PCR and two cocktails of oligonucleotide probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 901-905.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhai Y-L, Nikaido T, Shiozawa T, Orii A, Fujii S: Expression of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases in smooth muscle tumors of the uterus. Int J Cancer (Pred Oncol). 1999, 84 (3): 244-250. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990621)84:3<244::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bahnassy A, Zekri ARN, El-Shehaby A, Abdallah S, Sherif GM: Human papillomavirus infection in Egyptian esophageal carcinoma: correlation with p53, p21 waf, mdm-2, C-erbB2 and impact on survival. Path Int. 2005, 55L: 53-62. 10.1111/j.1440-1827.2005.01804.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheung TH, Yu MM, Lo KW, Yim SF, Chung TK, Wong YF: Alteration of cyclin D1 and CDK4 gene in carcinoma of uterine cervix. Cancer Lett. 2001, 166 (2): 199-206. 10.1016/S0304-3835(01)00457-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakamura M, Sakaki T, Hashimoto H, Nakase H, Ishida E, Shimada K, Konishi N: Frequent alterations of the p14 ARFand p16 INK 4agenes in primary central nervous system lymphomas. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (17): 6335-6339.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tripathi A, Banerjee S, Roy A, Roychowdhury S, Panda CK: Alterations of the P16 gene in uterine cervical carcinoma from Indian patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003, 13 (4): 472-9. 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13330.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oda Y, Sakamoto A, Saito T, Matsuda S, Tanaka K, Iwamoto Y, Tsuneyoshi M: Secondary malignant giant cell tumor of bone: molecular abnormalities of p53 and H-ras gene correlated with malignant transformation. Histopathology. 2001, 39: 629-637. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2001.01275.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols GE, Williams ME, Gaffey MJ, Stoler MH: Cyclin D1 gene expression in human cervical neoplasia. Mod Pathol. 1996, 9 (4): 418-25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bae DS, Cho SB, Kim YJ, Whang JD, Song SY, Park CS, Kim DS, Lee JH: Aberrant expression of cyclin D1 is associated with poor prognosis in early stage cervical cancer of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol. 2001, 81 (3): 341-7. 10.1006/gyno.2001.6196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dellas A, Schultheiss E, Leivas MR, Moch H, Torhorst J: Association of p27Kip1, cyclin E and c-myc expression with progression and prognosis in HPV-positive cervical neoplasms. Anticancer Res. 1998, 18 (6A): 3991-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Volgareva G, Zavalishina L, Andreeva Y, Frank G, Krutikova E, Golovina D, Bliev A, Spitkovsky D, Ermilova V, Kisseljov F: Protein p16 as a marker of dysplastic and neoplastic alterations in cervical epithelial cells. BMC Cancer. 2004, 4: 58-10.1186/1471-2407-4-58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zerfass-Thome K, Zwerschke W, Mannhardt B, Tindle R, Botz JW, Jansen-Durr P: Inactivation of the cdk inhibitor p27Kip1 by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein. Ocogene. 1996, 13 (11): 2323-30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Van de Putte G, Holm R, Lie AK, Trope CG, Kristensen GB: Expression of p27, p21, and p16 protein in early squamous cervical cancer and its relation to prognosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2003, 89 (1): 140-7. 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00010-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Troncone G, Vetrani A, Rosa GD, Gerbasio D, Palombini L: Cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p27 Kip1 expression in normal and neoplastic cervical epithelia. J Clin Pathol. 1999, 52: 880-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tae Kim Y, Kyoung Choi E, Hoon Cho N, Hung Ko J, Ick Yang W, Wook Kim J, Ho Lee S: Expression of cyclin E and p27(KIP1) in cervical carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2000, 153 (1–2): 41-50. 10.1016/S0304-3835(00)00345-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shiozawa T, Shiohara S, Kanai M, Konishi I, Fujii S, Nikaido T: Expression of the cell cycle regulator p27 (Kip1) in normal squamous epithelium, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Immunohistochemistry and functional aspects. Cancer. 2001, 92 (12): 3005-3011. 10.1002/1097-0142(20011215)92:12<3005::AID-CNCR10153>3.0.CO;2-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tringler B, Gup CJ, Singh M, Groshong S, Shroyer AL, Heinz DA, Shroyer KR: Evaluation of p16INK4A and pRb expression in cervical squamous and glandular neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 2004, 35 (6): 689-696. 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.02.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsuda H, Hashiguchi Y, Nishimura S, Kawamura N, Inoue T, Yamamoto K: Relationship between HPV typing and abnormality of G1 cell cycle regulators in cervical neoplasm. Gynecol Oncol. 2003, 91 (3): 476-85. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang LW, Chao SL, Hwang JL, Chou YY: Down-regulation of p27 is associated with malignant transformation and aggressive phenotype of cervical neoplasms. Gynecol Oncol. 2002, 85 (3): 524-8. 10.1006/gyno.2002.6666.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Nadia M. Mokhtar, head of Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, for her generous help in revising the H&E slides and immunohistochemical results. The authors would also thank assoc prof. Hanaa M. Alam El-Din for her help in editing the manuscript. This study was supported by the Grant Office of Cairo University, National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdel Rahman N Zekri.

Additional information

Competing interests

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

AAB: She put the study design, she is the pathologist responsible for diagnosis of cases and immunohistochemical studies, she participated in doing the molecular studies and she wrote the manuscript.

ARNZ: He participated in the study design, doing the molecular studies and wrote the manuscript and he was responsible for the detection and typing of HPV and coordinated the whole work team.

MS: She participated in the study design, participated in doing the molecular studies and in writing the manuscript.

ML: He was responsible for the clinical part of the study as well as for the management and follow-up of carcinoma cases.

MM: The statistician responsible for the statistical and survival analysis of the manuscript.

OAS: The gynecologist responsible for collecting samples, clinical assessment and diagnosis as well as for the follow-up of cases.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bahnassy, A.A., Zekri, A.R., Saleh, M. et al. The possible role of cell cycle regulators in multistep process of HPV-associated cervical carcinoma. BMC Clin Pathol 7, 4 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-7-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-7-4

Keywords