Primary histologic diagnosis using automated whole slide imaging: a validation study
© Gilbertson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 14 October 2005
Accepted: 27 April 2006
Published: 27 April 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Oct 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Nov 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vincenzo Della Mea|
|17 Jan 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - bela molnar|
|20 Jan 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - peter Hamilton|
|7 Feb 2006||Author responded||Author comments - John Gilbertson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Feb 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - bela molnar|
|17 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vincenzo Della Mea|
|28 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - peter Hamilton|
|18 Mar 2006||Author responded||Author comments - John Gilbertson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|18 Mar 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Apr 2006||Author responded||Author comments - John Gilbertson|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 Apr 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Apr 2006||Editorially accepted|
|27 Apr 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-6-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.