Survey of CF mutations in the clinical laboratory
© Huber et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 2 September 2002
Accepted: 19 November 2002
Published: 19 November 2002
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Sep 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Sep 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Jacques Cassiman|
|28 Oct 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eitam Kerem|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|8 Nov 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Klaus Huber|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|8 Nov 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|11 Nov 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jean-Jacques Cassiman|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|19 Nov 2002||Editorially accepted|
|19 Nov 2002||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-2-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.