Ki-67 is a strong prognostic marker of non-small cell lung cancer when tissue heterogeneity is considered
© Tabata et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 31 December 2013
Accepted: 2 May 2014
Published: 13 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|31 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kazuhiro Tabata|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giulio Rossi|
|24 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aurelie Fabre|
|29 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Krzysztof OKon|
|19 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kazuhiro Tabata|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giulio Rossi|
|21 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Krzysztof OKon|
|30 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aurelie Fabre|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|2 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|13 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-14-23|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.