Comparability of HbA1c and lipids measured with dried blood spot versus venous samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis
© Affan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 6 August 2013
Accepted: 1 May 2014
Published: 12 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Aug 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ozra tabatabaei-Malazy|
|9 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Prashant Mathur|
|16 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Funk|
|24 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Eshan Affan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Funk|
|30 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Prashant Mathur|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|12 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-14-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.