Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparability of HbA1c and lipids measured with dried blood spot versus venous samples: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Clinical Pathology201414:21

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-14-21

Received: 6 August 2013

Accepted: 1 May 2014

Published: 12 May 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Aug 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ozra tabatabaei-Malazy
9 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prashant Mathur
16 Dec 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Funk
24 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Eshan Affan
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Funk
30 Apr 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Prashant Mathur
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 May 2014 Editorially accepted
12 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6890-14-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The George Institute for Global Health
(2)
The University of Sydney
(3)
Westmead Hospital

Advertisement