Ultrastructural features of neuroblastic tumours in relation to morphological, and molecular findings; a retrospective review study
© Latimer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 6 January 2014
Accepted: 19 March 2014
Published: 31 March 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Jan 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - neil sebire|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vito Pistoia|
|27 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroyuki Shimada|
|18 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - neil sebire|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vito Pistoia|
|3 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroyuki Shimada|
|12 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - neil sebire|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hiroyuki Shimada|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Mar 2014||Editorially accepted|
|31 Mar 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-14-13|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.