Colorectal cancer in patients seen at the teaching hospitals of Guadeloupe and Martinique: discrepancies, similarities in clinicopathological features, and p53 status
© Decastel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 17 July 2013
Accepted: 25 March 2014
Published: 29 March 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Rambau|
|10 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Renato Mariani-Costantini|
|29 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Monique Decastel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Rambau|
|30 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Renato Mariani-Costantini|
|24 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Monique Decastel|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Mar 2014||Editorially accepted|
|29 Mar 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-14-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.