Open Access

Expression of histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3 in urothelial bladder cancer

  • Cédric Poyet1,
  • Bastian Jentsch2,
  • Thomas Hermanns1,
  • Daniel Schweckendiek1,
  • Hans-Helge Seifert1, 4,
  • Martin Schmidtpeter1,
  • Tullio Sulser1,
  • Holger Moch2,
  • Peter J Wild2 and
  • Glen Kristiansen3, 5Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Clinical PathologyBMC series ¿ open, inclusive and trusted201414:10

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-14-10

Received: 22 July 2013

Accepted: 10 March 2014

Published: 13 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are known to be associated with an overexpression in different types of cancer such as colon and prostate cancer. In this study we aimed to evaluate the protein expression of class I HDACs in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Methods

A tissue microarray containing 348 tissuesamples from 174 patients with a primary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder was immunohistochemically stained for HDAC 1, 2 and 3. Intensity of staining was evaluated and the association with clinico-pathological features and prognosis was assessed.

Results

High HDAC expression levels were found in 40 to 60% of all investigated urothelial carcinomas (HDAC-1: 40%, HDAC-2: 42%, HDAC-3: 59%).

HDAC-1 and HDAC-2 were significantly associated with higher tumour grades.

Although all three markers could not predict progression in univariate analyses, high HDAC-1 expression was associated with a trend toward poorer prognosis. Patients with high-grade tumours and high expression levels of HDAC-1 were more likely to progress compared to all other patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

High-grade noninvasive papillary bladder tumours are associated with high expression levels of HDAC-1 and HDAC-2. High grade tumours in combination with high expression of HDAC-1 showed a worse prognosis than the other tumours. The high expression levels of HDACs observed particularly in high grade urothelial bladder cancer clearly warrant subsequent studies on the potential use of HDAC inhibitors as a novel therapeutic approach.

Keywords

Class I HDACs Urothelial cancer Molecular markers

Background

The majority of bladder cancer patients (75-80%) initially present with papillary noninvasive (pTa) or superficially invasive (pT1) urothelial carcinoma, whereas the remaining 20-25% of primary tumours are already muscle invasive (≥ pT2) at first diagnosis [1, 2].

Among superficial tumours, almost 70% recur after transurethral resection and up to 25% of them show progression into a muscle invasive disease [3]. Bladder cancer patients have to be monitored closely for disease recurrence and progression, which contributes to the high costs of this disease. Therefore there is a great interest in identifying markers that can diagnose superficial cancer with a high risk of progression and allow for more specific surveillance strategies [4]. So far no established marker allows prediction of tumour progression.

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) constitute a family of enzymes that deacetylate histones and other cellular proteins. They are major regulators of transcription and are also important in other cellular processes [5]. HDACs are classified into four different classes based on the phylogenetic analysis of their structure and homology to yeast enzymes [6]. Class I HDACs are divided into four isoforms (HDAC-1, -2, -3 and -8) and are known to be associated with an overexpression in different types of cancer such as colon and prostate cancer [7, 8]. Published expression array data for urothelial cancer could demonstrate an overexpression of different class I HDACs compared to normal urothelium. Especially, the first three isoforms HDAC-1, -2 and -3 were found to be overexpressed. Contrary to HDAC-8, for which no overexpression was found [2, 912]. In contrast to these findings, a more recent study of Xu and colleagues reported no difference of expression in the expression levels of HDAC-2 between normal urothelial and bladder cancer tissue as assessed by immunohistochemistry [13]. Few studies have found an effect for HDAC-inhibitors (HDAC-i) in urothelial cancer cell lines [12, 1417], however, a broad expression analysis of HDACs in urothelial carcinomas has not been conducted so far. In addition, there is no study available on the prognostic relevance of class I HDACs in bladder cancer. We aimed to analyse the expression patterns of the most promising class I HDACs (HDAC-1, -2 and -3) in a representative cohort of primary bladder cancers and correlated these to clinico-pathological parameters including tumour stage, grade, multifocality, adjacent carcinoma in situ, growth pattern and finally clinical follow-up data.

Methods

Bladder cancer tissue microarray (TMA)

Tissue microarrays (TMA) contained 348 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded urothelial bladder cancer tissues from 174 patients and were constructed as previously described [18]. All tumour samples were represented in duplicate tissue cores (1 mm). The TMA consisted of tumour tissues only, normal urothelial samples were not available. Specimens were collected between 1990 and 2006 by the Institute of Surgical Pathology, University of Zurich, Switzerland. The TMA includes a series of 174 consecutive (non-selected) primary urothelial bladder tumours. Finally, the TMA contained 90 pTa, 68 pT1 and 16 ≥ pT2 tumours. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides of all specimens were reevaluated by two experienced pathologists (BJ, GK).

Tumour stage and grade were assigned according to UICC and WHO criteria.

Retrospective clinical follow-up data were available for all of 174 patients (100%). The median follow-up period for the entire cohort was 110.6 months (range 32.4 to 266.8 months). Clinico-pathologic data are summarized in Table 1. The study was approved by the local scientific ethics committee Kantonale Ethikkommission Zürich (http://​www.​kek.​zh.​ch/​, approval no.: StV-Nr. 25/2007).
Table 1

Patient and tumor characteristics and results of molecular and immunohistochemical analyses

Variable

Categorization

n analyzable

%

Total n = 174

  

Clinico-pathologic data:

  

Age at diagnosis (median, range)

69,5 years (32–92)

 
 

<70 years

87

50.0

 

≥70 years

87

50.0

Sex

   
 

Female

43

24.7

 

Male

131

75.3

Tumor stage (WHO 1973a)

  
 

pTa

90

51.7

 

pT1

68

39.1

 

pT2

13

7.5

 

pT3

2

1.1

 

pT4

1

0.6

Histologic grade (WHO 1973a)

  
 

G1

44

25.3

 

G2

87

50.0

 

G3

43

24.7

Histologic grade (WHO 2004b)

  
 

Low grade

101

58.0

 

High grade

73

42.0

Adjacent carcinoma in situ

  
 

No

158

90.8

 

Yes

16

9.2

Multiplicity

  
 

Solitary

124

71.3

 

Multifocal

50

28.7

Growth pattern

  
 

Papillary

159

91.4

 

Solid

15

8.6

Immunohistochemistry (IHC):

  

HDAC-1

   
 

Low expression

104

59.8

 

High expression

70

40.2

HDAC-2

   
 

Low expression

101

58.0

 

High expression

73

42.0

HDAC-3

   
 

Low expression

71

40.8

 

High expression

103

59.2

aStaging and grading according to the 1973 WHO classification system.

bStaging and grading according to the 2004 WHO classification system.

Immunohistochemistry

The TMA was freshly cut (3 μm). For immunohistochemical detection of HDAC-1, -2 and -3 isoforms on tissue samples, prediluted polyclonal rabbit IgG antibody directed against HDAC-1 (1:11, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), monoclonal mouse IgG antibody directed against HDAC-2 (1:5000, Abcam) and monoclonal mouse IgG antibody directed against HDAC-3 (1:500, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used on 3 μm paraffin sections, as described [19]. Ki-67 was detected with clone MIB-1 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark; dilution 1:50).

Immunohistochemical studies utilised an avidin-biotin peroxidase method with a diaminobenzidine (DAB) chromatogen. After antigen retrieval (microwave oven for 30 min at 250 W) immunohistochemistry was carried out in a NEXES immunostainer (Ventana, Tucson, AZ) following manufacturer’s instructions.

Evaluation of Immunohistochemistry

One surgical pathologist (BJ) evaluated the slides under the supervision of the senior author. Nuclear staining of HDAC isoforms was scored applying a semiquantitative immunoreactivity scoring (IRS) system that incorporates the percentual area and the intensity of immunoreactivity resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 12, as described previously [19]. For statistical analysis, the intensity of HDAC expression was grouped into low vs. high rates of expression. Cases exhibiting an IRS from 0–8 were pooled in a HDAC low expression group whereas cases with a higher IRS (9–12) were designated HDAC high expression group. The percentage of Ki-67 positive cells of each specimen was determined as described previously [20]. High Ki-67 labelling index was defined as more than 10% of positive tumour cells [21].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Differences were considered significant if p < 0.05. To study statistical associations between clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical data, contingency table analysis and 2-sided Fisher’s exact tests were used. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate statistical association between clinicopathologic/immunohistochemical data and progression free survival (PFS). PFS curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method with significance evaluated by 2-sided log-rank statistics. For the analysis of PFS, patients were censored at the date when there was a stage-shift (from Ta to T1-4, respectively from T1 to T2-T4), or if there was distant metastatic disease.

Results

Staining patterns of HDAC1-3

HDAC 1–3 protein expression in bladder cancer tissue samples was investigated by immunohistochemical analysis of the TMA containing 174 specimens from patients with a primary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. All 174 (100%) patients could be evaluated for HDAC immunostaining. All three investigated HDACs showed high expression levels in 40 to 60% of all tumours. Figures 1, 2 and 3 represent examples of typical exclusively nuclear staining patterns of HDAC-1, -2 and -3 (low - and high expression). For HDAC-1 40% of the tumours showed high expression levels, for HDAC-2 42% and for HDAC-3 even 59% (Table 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6890-14-10/MediaObjects/12907_2013_Article_195_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining with HDAC-1. (A) low expression HDAC-1 staining pattern in a low-grade urothelial tumour; (B) high expression HDAC-1 staining pattern in a typically high-grade urothelial tumour.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6890-14-10/MediaObjects/12907_2013_Article_195_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Immunohistochemical staining with HDAC-2. (A) low expression HDAC-2 staining pattern in a low-grade urothelial tumour; (B) high expression HDAC-2 staining pattern in a typically high-grade urothelial tumour.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6890-14-10/MediaObjects/12907_2013_Article_195_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Immunohistochemical staining with HDAC-3. (A) low expression HDAC-3 staining pattern in a low-grade urothelial tumour; (B) high expression HDAC-3 staining pattern in a typically high-grade urothelial tumour.

Correlations to clinico-pathological parameters

HDAC-1 to 3 and Ki-67 were correlated with clinico-pathologic characteristics (stage, grading, adjacent carcinoma in situ, multiplicity and growth pattern) of the tumours (Table 2). Strong staining of HDAC-1 and HDAC-2 was associated with higher grading (both WHO 1973 and 2004), additionally tumours with high expression levels of HDAC-2 presented more often with adjacent carcinoma in situ compared to tumours with weak HDAC-2 staining. High expression levels of HDAC-3 were only associated with higher tumour grade according the new WHO 2004 grading system. Ki-67 showed a significant correlation with all clinico-pathologic characteristics (p < 0.05), except for tumour multiplicity. The expression levels of all three tested HDAC proteins were significantly associated with each other (data not shown). Furthermore, strong staining of all three HDACs correlated with high Ki-67 labelling index (for HDAC-1: Spearmans Rho r s  = 0.325, p < 0.001, for HDAC-2: r s  = 0.271, p < 0.001; for HDAC-3: r s  = 0.191, p < 0.05).
Table 2

Associations of the HDAC-1, -2 and 3 and Ki-67 with pathologic characteristics (n = 174)

Variable

Categorization

HDAC-1 expression

HDAC-2 expression

HDAC-3 expression

Ki-67 expression

  

Low

High

p

Low

High

p

Low

High

p

Low

High

p

Tumor stage (WHO 1973)a

 

pTa

59

31

0.162

55

35

0.811

37

53

0.257

71

19

<0.001

 

pT1

37

31

 

37

31

 

30

38

 

35

33

 
 

pT2

5

8

 

7

6

 

2

11

 

2

11

 
 

pT3

2

0

 

1

1

 

1

1

 

0

2

 
 

pT4

1

0

 

1

0

 

1

0

 

0

1

 

Histologic grade (WHO 1973)a

 

G1

29

15

0.022

32

12

0.026

20

24

0.425

39

5

<0.001

 

G2

57

30

 

50

37

 

37

50

 

61

26

 
 

G3

18

25

 

19

24

 

14

29

 

8

35

 

Histologic grade (WHO 2004)b

 

Low grade

71

30

0.001

68

33

0.005

49

52

0.019

87

14

<0.001

 

High grade

33

40

 

33

40

 

22

51

 

21

52

 

Adjacent carcinoma in situb

 

No

96

62

0.432

96

62

0.032

65

93

1.00

105

53

<0.001

 

Yes

8

8

 

5

11

 

6

10

 

3

13

 

Multiplicityb

 

Solitary

79

45

0.124

77

47

0.093

49

75

0.587

86

38

0.003

 

Multifocal

25

25

 

24

26

 

22

28

 

22

28

 

Growth patternb

 

Papillary

97

62

0.278

94

65

0.416

65

94

1.00

107

52

<0.001

 

Solid

7

8

 

7

8

 

6

9

 

1

14

 

aChi-Square Pearson (2-sided); bold face representing p-values < 0.05.

bFisher’s exact test (2-sided); bold face representing p-values < 0.05.

Univariate progression analyses

A total of 158 patients underwent TUR for a primary Ta or T1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and were followed for a median of 110.7 month (range: 32.4 - 245.9 month). In this group, only high expression levels of Ki-67 were significantly associated with increased risk of progression (p < 0.01). Increased expression of HDAC-1 showed a tendency for higher progression rates, however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.085). Beside growth pattern none of the clinicopathological parameters were associated with PFS. Table 3 shows p-values for the pathological data and the molecular markers.
Table 3

Univariate analyses of disease progresssion (n =158)

Variable

Categorization

Tumor progression

na

events

pb

Pathologic data:

   

Tumor stage (WHO 1973c)

   
 

pTa

85

10

0.412

 

pT1

68

12

 

Histologic grade (WHO 1973c)

   
 

G1

43

3

0.093

 

G2

82

12

 
 

G3

28

7

 

Histologic grade (WHO 2004d)

   
 

Low grade

95

10

0.092

 

High grade

58

12

 

Adjacent carcinoma in situ

   
 

No

141

20

0.570

 

Yes

12

2

 

Multifocality

   
 

Unifocal tumor

111

15

0.486

 

Multifocal tumor

42

7

 

Growth pattern

   
 

Papillary

146

17

<0.0001

 

Solid

7

5

 

Immunohistochemistry:

   

HDAC-1

    
 

Low expression

92

9

0.085

 

High expression

61

13

 

HDAC-2

    
 

Low expression

88

12

0.628

 

High expression

65

10

 

HDAC-3

    
 

Low expression

65

8

0.754

 

High expression

88

14

 

Ki-67 IHC

    
 

Low expression

101

9

0.004

 

High expression

52

13

 

aOnly primary pTa and pT1 tumours are included.

bLog Rank test (2-sided); bold face representing p-values <0.05.

cStaging and grading according to the 1973 WHO classification system.

dStaging and grading according to the 2004 WHO classification system.

To test whether the combination of high expression levels of HDAC-1 & HDAC-2 with different known clinico-pathological parameters can predict prognosis we performed an univariate cox-regression analysis. The combination of high-grade tumours and high expression levels of HDAC-1 was a predictor of PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.640; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.021-2.636; p = 0.044). However, this combination did not outperform tumor growth pattern or Ki-67 as a predictor of outcome. Both parameters were able to predict prognosis in univariate analysis (Table 3). The combination of HDAC-1 and growth pattern or HDAC-1 and Ki-67 were of no additional value to predict prognosis. In both cases the p-values were higher than for growth pattern or Ki-67 alone (data not shown).

Kaplan-Meier analyses for PFS are depicted in Figures 4, 5, 6, and show that bladder cancer patients with the combined feature of high grade tumours and high expression pattern of HDAC-1 have a significantly shorter progression free survival than all other patients (Figure 4). High HDAC-1 expression alone showed a tendency for shorter PFS, although not statistically significant (Figure 5). In addition, patients with high expression levels of Ki-67 have a significantly shorter PFS (Figure 6).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6890-14-10/MediaObjects/12907_2013_Article_195_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Kaplan-Meier analyses for progression-free survival for group of high-grade tumours in combination with high expression levels of HDAC-1 vs. high- and low-grade tumours with low expression levels of HDAC-1. For statistical analysis for survival curves Log-Rank test was used.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6890-14-10/MediaObjects/12907_2013_Article_195_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Kaplan-Meier analyses for progression-free survival for HDAC-1 staining. For statistical analysis for survival curves Log-Rank test was used.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1472-6890-14-10/MediaObjects/12907_2013_Article_195_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Kaplan-Meier analyses for progression-free survival for ki-67 staining. For statistical analysis for survival curves Log-Rank test was used.

Discussion

This is the first comprehensive immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of several class I HDAC proteins (1, 2 and 3) in urothelial carcinoma. In our study, we found all three isoforms in a relevant amount of all investigated urothelial tumours. HDAC-1 and HDAC-2 were highly associated with high-grade superficial papillary bladder tumours. Additionally, high expression levels of HDAC-1 showed a tendency towards a shorter PFS.

So far, little was known about class I HDAC expression pattern in urothelial cancer [5]. According to the Proteinatlas (http://​www.​proteinatlas.​org), HDAC-1 to -3 expression levels are moderate at most in urothelial cancer [22]. In previous expression arrays HDAC-2 and -3 showed higher expression levels in urothelial cancer than in normal urothelial tissue [2, 9, 11]. Expression array data from another study by Wild et al. demonstrated an upregulation of HDAC-1 in bladder cancer compared to normal urothelial tissue [23]. On the contrary, published data from other groups did not reveal any difference of class I HDAC expression between urothelial cancer and normal urothelium in microarray data [24, 25]. In accordance with these findings a study from Xu reported no difference in immunohistochemical expression of HDAC-2 in human bladder cancer tissue (142 cases) compared to normal urothelial tissue (23 cases) [13].

In a recent study, Niegisch and colleagues were able to show upregulation of HDAC-2 mRNAs in a subset of tested tumours compared to normal urothelium [9, 11, 17]. However, only 24 tumour tissues and 12 normal samples were tested.

Our study is the first attempt to test the immunohistochemical expression of class I HDACs in a large cohort of patients with bladder cancer. As class I HDACs can be detected in a relevant group of urothelial cancer, they may therefore be relevant in pathophysiology and as target proteins for treatment.

Besides the distinct presence of class I HDACs in urothelial cancer, high expression levels of HDAC-1 and -2 were associated with stage and grade of this tumours. Overexpression of HDACs has been found in several other solid tumours such as prostate and colon cancer [7, 26, 27]. High expression levels of class I HDACs correlated with tumour dedifferentiation and higher proliferative fractions (measured by Ki-67) in urothelial carcinoma, which is in line with in vitro studies showing that high HDAC activity leads to tumour dedifferentiation and enhanced tumour cell proliferation [2830]. Despite the growth inhibitory effects of HDAC-i demonstrated in various cell lines including bladder cancer cells, a broad expression analysis of this attractive target has not been conducted yet [1216, 31, 32].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study analysing HDAC-1, -2 and -3 expression in bladder cancer and its association to prognosis. In our study HDAC-1 was found to be of rough prognostic relevance in pTa and pT1 tumours. High expression levels of class I HDACs have been found to be of prognostic relevance in other tumour entities before. Other study groups previously reported the association of class I HDACs with more aggressive tumours and even shortened patient survival in prostate and gastric cancer [7, 33]. Our findings suggest that HDAC-1 may have a role in prognosis of superficial urothelial tumours.

In our work the rate of Ki-67 positive tumour cells was highly associated with tumour grade, stage, and a shorter PFS. A substantial amount of research has demonstrated the prognostic role of Ki-67 in urothelial cancer; its prognostic value and its association with pathological parameters and prognosis could be shown in several studies [3436]. These findings are in line with our work and confirm the representativeness and validity of this TMA-construct. Furthermore, we observed a strong correlation between the proliferation index (Ki-67) and all three investigated HDACs. The connection between HDAC expression and Ki-67 observed in urothelial carcinoma has already been demonstrated for prostate, renal and colorectal cancer in previous studies [7, 19, 37].

Additionally, intravesical instillation of HDAC-i may have a potential as chemopreventive agent to treat superficial bladder cancer, as up to 50% of superficial tumours showed high expression levels of HDACs. However, it is not clear whether HDAC protein expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry is a predictor for treatment response to HDAC-i. Thus, additional studies are needed to clarify the role HDAC-i in non-invasive urothelial cancer.

Our study has several limitations, including its retrospective design and the use of immunohistochemical methodology, which has inherent limitations, including scoring of staining. We used a standardized and well-established semiquantitative scoring method in accordance with previous publications to reduce variability. In addition, the proportion of muscle-invasive bladder cancer was limited and as a consequence we cannot draw any conclusion for this subgroup of tumours. Therefore future research should also try to assess whether class I HDACs have a prognostic value in locally advanced invasive or metastatic urothelial cancer.

Conclusion

High levels of class I HDACs showed a significant correlation with cellular proliferation and tumor grade. Non-invasive (pTa) and pT1 bladder tumours with high expression levels of HDAC-1 showed a tendency towards shorter PFS in our cohort. However, further prospective studies and bigger cohorts including muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients are needed to evaluate the prognostic value of HDACs. Moreover the high expression levels of HDACs in urothelial bladder cancer might be indicative for a treatment response to HDAC-i which ought to be evaluated in further studies.

Abbreviations

HDACs: 

Histone deacetylases

HDAC-i: 

HDAC-inhibitors

TMA: 

Tissue microarray

IRS: 

Immunoreactivity scoring

PFS: 

Progression free survival.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Institute of Pathology, University of Zurich, for providing material and technical assistance to construct the TMA. Furthermore CP would like to thank Damina Balmer for her corrections and comments on the final manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, University of Zürich
(2)
Institute of Pathology, University of Zürich
(3)
Department of Pathology, University of Bonn
(4)
Department of Urology, Hegau-Bodensee Hospital
(5)
Institute of Pathology, University of Bonn

References

  1. Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR, Mostofi FK: The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee. Am J Surg Pathol. 1998, 22 (12): 1435-1448. 10.1097/00000478-199812000-00001.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Sanchez-Carbayo M, Socci ND, Lozano J, Saint F, Cordon-Cardo C: Defining molecular profiles of poor outcome in patients with invasive bladder cancer using oligonucleotide microarrays. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24 (5): 778-789. 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2375.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Lapham RL, Ro JY, Staerkel GA, Ayala AG: Pathology of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and its clinical implications. Semin Surg Oncol. 1997, 13 (5): 307-318. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2388(199709/10)13:5<307::AID-SSU4>3.0.CO;2-H.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Juffs HG, Moore MJ, Tannock IF: The role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2002, 3 (12): 738-747. 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00930-0.View ArticlePubMed
  5. Witt O, Deubzer HE, Milde T, Oehme I: HDAC family: what are the cancer relevant targets?. Cancer Lett. 2009, 277 (1): 8-21. 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.08.016.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Bradner JE, West N, Grachan ML, Greenberg EF, Haggarty SJ, Warnow T, Mazitschek R: Chemical phylogenetics of histone deacetylases. Nat Chem Biol. 2010, 6 (3): 238-243. 10.1038/nchembio.313.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  7. Weichert W, Roske A, Gekeler V, Beckers T, Stephan C, Jung K, Fritzsche FR, Niesporek S, Denkert C, Dietel M, Kristiansen G: Histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3 are highly expressed in prostate cancer and HDAC2 expression is associated with shorter PSA relapse time after radical prostatectomy. British journal of cancer. 2008, 98 (3): 604-610. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604199.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  8. Wilson AJ, Byun DS, Popova N, Murray LB, L'Italien K, Sowa Y, Arango D, Velcich A, Augenlicht LH, Mariadason JM: Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) and other class I HDACs regulate colon cell maturation and p21 expression and are deregulated in human colon cancer. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006, 281 (19): 13548-13558. 10.1074/jbc.M510023200.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Lindgren D, Frigyesi A, Gudjonsson S, Sjodahl G, Hallden C, Chebil G, Veerla S, Ryden T, Mansson W, Liedberg F, Höglund M: Combined gene expression and genomic profiling define two intrinsic molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma and gene signatures for molecular grading and outcome. Cancer Res. 2010, 70 (9): 3463-3472. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4213.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Dyrskjot L, Kruhoffer M, Thykjaer T, Marcussen N, Jensen JL, Moller K, Orntoft TF: Gene expression in the urinary bladder: a common carcinoma in situ gene expression signature exists disregarding histopathological classification. Cancer Res. 2004, 64 (11): 4040-4048. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3620.View ArticlePubMed
  11. Dyrskjot L, Zieger K, Real FX, Malats N, Carrato A, Hurst C, Kotwal S, Knowles M, Malmstrom PU, de la Torre M, Wester K, Allory Y, Vordos D, Caillault A, Radvanyi F, Hein AM, Jensen JL, Jensen KM, Marcussen N, Orntoft TF: Gene expression signatures predict outcome in non-muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma: a multicenter validation study. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13 (12): 3545-3551. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2940.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Ozawa A, Tanji N, Kikugawa T, Sasaki T, Yanagihara Y, Miura N, Yokoyama M: Inhibition of bladder tumour growth by histone deacetylase inhibitor. BJU Int. 2010, 105 (8): 1181-1186. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08795.x.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Xu XS, Wang L, Abrams J, Wang G: Histone deacetylases (HDACs) in XPC gene silencing and bladder cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2011, 4: 17-10.1186/1756-8722-4-17.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  14. Buckley MT, Yoon J, Yee H, Chiriboga L, Liebes L, Ara G, Qian X, Bajorin DF, Sun TT, Wu XR, Osman I: The histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat (PXD101) suppresses bladder cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. J Transl Med. 2007, 5: 49-10.1186/1479-5876-5-49.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  15. Qu W, Kang YD, Zhou MS, Fu LL, Hua ZH, Wang LM: Experimental study on inhibitory effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor MS-275 and TSA on bladder cancer cells. Urol Oncol. 2010, 28 (6): 648-654. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.11.018.View ArticlePubMed
  16. Vallo S, Xi W, Hudak L, Juengel E, Tsaur I, Wiesner C, Haferkamp A, Blaheta RA: HDAC inhibition delays cell cycle progression of human bladder cancer cells in vitro. Anticancer Drugs. 2011, 22 (10): 1002-1009.PubMed
  17. Niegisch G, Knievel J, Koch A, Hader C, Fischer U, Albers P, Schulz WA: Changes in histone deacetylase (HDAC) expression patterns and activity of HDAC inhibitors in urothelial cancers. Urol Oncol. 2012, 31 (8): 1770-9.View ArticlePubMed
  18. Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S, Torhorst J, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP: Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens. Nat Med. 1998, 4 (7): 844-847. 10.1038/nm0798-844.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Fritzsche FR, Weichert W, Roske A, Gekeler V, Beckers T, Stephan C, Jung K, Scholman K, Denkert C, Dietel M, Kristiansen G: Class I histone deacetylases 1, 2 and 3 are highly expressed in renal cell cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008, 8: 381-10.1186/1471-2407-8-381.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  20. Nocito A, Bubendorf L, Tinner EM, Suess K, Wagner U, Forster T, Kononen J, Fijan A, Bruderer J, Schmid U, Ackermann D, Maurer R, Alund G, Knönagel H, Rist M, Anabitarte M, Hering F, Hardmeier T, Schoenenberger AJ, Flury R, Jäger P, Fehr JL, Schraml P, Moch H, Mihatsch MJ, Gasser T, Sauter G: Microarrays of bladder cancer tissue are highly representative of proliferation index and histological grade. J Pathol. 2001, 194 (3): 349-357. 10.1002/1096-9896(200107)194:3<349::AID-PATH887>3.0.CO;2-D.View ArticlePubMed
  21. van Rhijn BW, Vis AN, van der Kwast TH, Kirkels WJ, Radvanyi F, Ooms EC, Chopin DK, Boeve ER, Jobsis AC, Zwarthoff EC: Molecular grading of urothelial cell carcinoma with fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 and MIB-1 is superior to pathologic grade for the prediction of clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2003, 21 (10): 1912-1921. 10.1200/JCO.2003.05.073.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Uhlen M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Jonasson K, Forsberg M, Zwahlen M, Kampf C, Wester K, Hober S, Wernerus H, Björling L, Ponten F: Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas. Nat Biotechnol. 2010, 28 (12): 1248-1250. 10.1038/nbt1210-1248.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Wild PJ, Herr A, Wissmann C, Stoehr R, Rosenthal A, Zaak D, Simon R, Knuechel R, Pilarsky C, Hartmann A: Gene expression profiling of progressive papillary noninvasive carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (12): 4415-4429. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0259.View ArticlePubMed
  24. Lee JS, Leem SH, Lee SY, Kim SC, Park ES, Kim SB, Kim SK, Kim YJ, Kim WJ, Chu IS: Expression signature of E2F1 and its associated genes predict superficial to invasive progression of bladder tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (16): 2660-2667. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0977.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Mengual L, Burset M, Ars E, Lozano JJ, Villavicencio H, Ribal MJ, Alcaraz A: DNA microarray expression profiling of bladder cancer allows identification of noninvasive diagnostic markers. J Urol. 2009, 182 (2): 741-748. 10.1016/j.juro.2009.03.084.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Ishihama K, Yamakawa M, Semba S, Takeda H, Kawata S, Kimura S, Kimura W: Expression of HDAC1 and CBP/p300 in human colorectal carcinomas. J Clin Pathol. 2007, 60 (11): 1205-1210. 10.1136/jcp.2005.029165.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  27. Halkidou K, Gaughan L, Cook S, Leung HY, Neal DE, Robson CN: Upregulation and nuclear recruitment of HDAC1 in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Prostate. 2004, 59 (2): 177-189. 10.1002/pros.20022.View ArticlePubMed
  28. Floryk D, Huberman E: Differentiation of androgen-independent prostate cancer PC-3 cells is associated with increased nuclear factor-kappaB activity. Cancer Res. 2005, 65 (24): 11588-11596. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1831.View ArticlePubMed
  29. Munster PN, Troso-Sandoval T, Rosen N, Rifkind R, Marks PA, Richon VM: The histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid induces differentiation of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61 (23): 8492-8497.PubMed
  30. Uchida H, Maruyama T, Nagashima T, Asada H, Yoshimura Y: Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce differentiation of human endometrial adenocarcinoma cells through up-regulation of glycodelin. Endocrinology. 2005, 146 (12): 5365-5373. 10.1210/en.2005-0359.View ArticlePubMed
  31. Kang MR, Kang JS, Yang JW, Kim BG, Kim JA, Jo YN, Lee K, Lee CW, Lee KH, Yun J, Kim HM, Han G, Kang JS, Park SK: Gene expression profiling of KBH-A42, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, in human leukemia and bladder cancer cell lines. Oncol Lett. 2012, 3 (1): 113-118.PubMed CentralPubMed
  32. Earel JK, VanOosten RL, Griffith TS: Histone deacetylase inhibitors modulate the sensitivity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-resistant bladder tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (1): 499-507. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3017.View ArticlePubMed
  33. Weichert W, Roske A, Gekeler V, Beckers T, Ebert MP, Pross M, Dietel M, Denkert C, Rocken C: Association of patterns of class I histone deacetylase expression with patient prognosis in gastric cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9 (2): 139-148. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70004-4.View ArticlePubMed
  34. Lopez-Beltran A, Luque RJ, Alvarez-Kindelan J, Quintero A, Merlo F, Carrasco JC, Requena MJ, Montironi R: Prognostic factors in stage T1 grade 3 bladder cancer survival: the role of G1-S modulators (p53, p21Waf1, p27kip1, Cyclin D1, and Cyclin D3) and proliferation index (ki67-MIB1). Eur Urol. 2004, 45 (5): 606-612. 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.11.011.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Margulis V, Lotan Y, Karakiewicz PI, Fradet Y, Ashfaq R, Capitanio U, Montorsi F, Bastian PJ, Nielsen ME, Muller SC, Rigaud J, Heukamp LC, Netto G, Lerner SP, Sagalowsky AI, Shariat SF: Multi-institutional validation of the predictive value of Ki-67 labeling index in patients with urinary bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009, 101 (2): 114-119. 10.1093/jnci/djn451.View ArticlePubMed
  36. Quintero A, Alvarez-Kindelan J, Luque RJ, Gonzalez-Campora R, Requena MJ, Montironi R, Lopez-Beltran A: Ki-67 MIB1 labelling index and the prognosis of primary TaT1 urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Clin Pathol. 2006, 59 (1): 83-88. 10.1136/jcp.2004.022939.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  37. Weichert W, Roske A, Niesporek S, Noske A, Buckendahl AC, Dietel M, Gekeler V, Boehm M, Beckers T, Denkert C: Class I histone deacetylase expression has independent prognostic impact in human colorectal cancer: specific role of class I histone deacetylases in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 2008, 14 (6): 1669-1677. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0990.View ArticlePubMed
  38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://​www.​biomedcentral.​com/​1472-6890/​14/​10/​prepub

Copyright

© Poyet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement