Prognostic impact of Skp2, ER and PGR in male and female patients with soft tissue sarcomas
© Sorbye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 22 October 2012
Accepted: 8 March 2013
Published: 15 March 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chien-Feng Li|
|17 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wei-Lien Wang|
|17 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - LOREDANA MORO|
|29 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Beck|
|4 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Sveinung Sorbye|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Beck|
|10 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chien-Feng Li|
|15 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wei-Lien Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Mar 2013||Editorially accepted|
|15 Mar 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-13-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.