Investigation of factors potentially influencing calcitonin levels in the screening and follow-up for medullary thyroid carcinoma: a cautionary note
- Christoph Guesgen†1,
- Arnulf Willms†1Email author,
- Axel Zwad1,
- Stephan Waldeck2,
- Helmut Wieler3 and
- Robert Schwab1
© Guesgen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 30 May 2013
Accepted: 30 October 2013
Published: 4 November 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 May 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giampaolo Papi|
|4 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maurizio Bevilacqua|
|20 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Arnulf Willms|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giampaolo Papi|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|30 Oct 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Nov 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-13-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.