Evaluation in an emergency department of rapid separator tubes containing thrombin for serum preparation prior to hs-cTnT and CK-MB analyses
© Budak et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 29 July 2012
Accepted: 7 June 2013
Published: 13 June 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|29 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochen Jarausch|
|23 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Gaze|
|15 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Yasemin Budak|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Yasemin Budak|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Yasemin Budak|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jochen Jarausch|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|7 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jun 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-13-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.