Expression profiling of 21 biomolecules in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas of Caucasian patients
- Dimitrios Krikelis†1Email author,
- Mattheos Bobos†2,
- Georgia Karayannopoulou3,
- Liliana Resiga4,
- Sofia Chrysafi2,
- Epaminontas Samantas5,
- Dimitrios Andreopoulos6,
- Vassilios Vassiliou6,
- Elisabeta Ciuleanu4 and
- George Fountzilas1
© Krikelis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 6 October 2012
Accepted: 24 January 2013
Published: 29 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mu-kuan chen|
|9 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Minghua Wu|
|16 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francois X Claret|
|20 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Dimitrios Krikelis|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Francois X Claret|
|4 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mu-kuan chen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|29 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-13-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.