Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cell culture model predicts human disease: Altered expression of junction proteins and matrix metalloproteinases in cervical dysplasia

  • Niina Kivi1,
  • Mikko Rönty2,
  • Jussi Tarkkanen2,
  • Petri Auvinen3 and
  • Eeva Auvinen1, 4Email author
BMC Clinical Pathology201212:9

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6890-12-9

Received: 30 July 2012

Accepted: 30 July 2012

Published: 3 August 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Eeva Auvinen
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
30 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
3 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6890-12-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Haartman Institute, Department of Virology, University of Helsinki
(2)
Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital Laboratory
(3)
DNA Sequencing and Genomics Laboratory, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki
(4)
Department of Virology and Immunology, Helsinki University Hospital Laboratory

Advertisement