Lack of MMP-9 expression is a marker for poor prognosis in Dukes’ B colorectal cancer
© Koskensalo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 June 2012
Accepted: 29 November 2012
Published: 7 December 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Jun 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cornelis Sier|
|11 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pallavi Garg|
|19 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Riyad Bendardaf|
|26 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Selja Koskensalo|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pallavi Garg|
|16 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cornelis Sier|
|23 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Selja Koskensalo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|7 Dec 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-12-24|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.