A first insight into the genotypic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Rwanda
© Gafirita et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 7 February 2012
Accepted: 1 November 2012
Published: 6 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|7 Feb 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Apr 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Benon Asiimwe|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Apr 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Prasit Palittapongarnpim|
|26 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher McEvoy|
|26 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Bates|
|21 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Benon Asiimwe|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Prasit Palittapongarnpim|
|2 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher McEvoy|
|2 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Bates|
|29 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Benon Asiimwe|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|29 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|1 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-12-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.