COLD-PCR enhanced melting curve analysis improves diagnostic accuracy for KRAS mutations in colorectal carcinoma
© Pritchard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 21 August 2010
Accepted: 26 November 2010
Published: 26 November 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Aug 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - G. Mike Makrigiorgos|
|6 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paola Parrella|
|8 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Zhuang Zuo|
|9 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Colin Pritchard|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Nov 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - G. Mike Makrigiorgos|
|23 Nov 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Colin Pritchard|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Nov 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|26 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6890-10-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.